GeForce GTX 980 Ti VS GeForce RTX 5090
We are comparing the GeForce GTX 980 Ti ( NVIDIA ) head-to-head with the GeForce RTX 5090 ( NVIDIA ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Note: This comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs. GeForce RTX 5090 is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 20, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce GTX 980 Ti AND GeForce RTX 5090
Here’s how GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce RTX 5090 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which graphics card excels where.
Why GeForce RTX 5090 is the best choice:
-
495% higher 4K Ultra FPS (125 vs 21)
-
405% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (207 vs 41)
-
360% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (253 vs 55)
-
124% higher Boost Clock (2407 MHz vs 1076 MHz)
-
702% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (46966 vs 5855)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce GTX 980 Ti AND GeForce RTX 5090
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce RTX 5090.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce RTX 5090 |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | GM200 | GB202-300 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Maxwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 900 | GeForce 50 |
| Release Date: | June 2, 2015 | January 30, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | 16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 8 billion | 92.2 billion |
| Density: | 13.3 MTr/mm² | 122.93 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 601 mm² | 750 |
| Board Length: | 267 mm | 304 mm |
| Board Width: | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Board Height: | 111 mm | 137 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 250 W | 575 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 22 | 170 |
| Shading Units: | 2816 | 21760 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 176 | 680 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 96 | 176 |
| Tensor Cores: | — | 680 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | — | 170 |
| Base Clock: | 1000 MHz | 2017 |
| Boost Clock: | 1076 MHz | 2407 |
| L1 Cache: | 48 KB (per SMM) | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache: | 3 MB | 96MB shared |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 103.3 GPixel/s | 423.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 189.4 GTexel/s | 1,636.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 6.060 TFLOPs | 104.8 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Size: | 6 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 384-bit | 512-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1753 MHz | 1750 |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 7000 Mbps | 28000 |
| Bandwidth: | 336.6 GB/s | 1792 |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | 5.2 | 12.0 |
| Ray Tracing: | 0 | Yes |
| DLSS: | 0 | DLSS 4 |
| DisplayPort: | 1.2 | 2.1b |
| HDMI: | 2.0 | — |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 55 | 253 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 41 | 207 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 21 | 125 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 5968 | 52760 |
| Time Spy | 5855 | 46966 |
| Solar Bay | — | 234280 |
| Port Royal | 3250 | 37963 |
| Fire Strike | 19504 | 87056 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 11819 | 108665 |
| Night Raid | 70108 | 207642 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 49950 | 419309 |
| Background Blur | 134.8 img/sec | 333 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 59.8 img/sec | 298.5 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 2.37 Gpixels/sec | 21.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 3.79 Gpixels/sec | 33.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 3.46 Gpixels/sec | 34.5 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.22 Gpixels/sec | 2.53 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 191.9 Gpixels/sec | 2850 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 4183.6 | 59146.9 FPS |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 13652 | 38868 |
| G2D Mark | 850 | 1412 |
| DirectX 11 | 106 | 341 |
| DirectX 12 | 55 | 177 |
| GPU Compute | 6103 | 24875 Ops/s |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 73.40 | 624.60 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 391.30 | 1568.70 |
| Car Chase | 375.20 | 1292.00 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 337.90 | 1244.60 |
| T-Rex | 1867.70 | 5493.70 |
| Tessellation | 2238.80 | 13760.70 |
| ALU 2 | 1803.60 | 15791.90 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 264.00 | 332.10 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 538 | 15030 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 7711 | 53861 |
| Half Precision | 7464 | 81080 |
| Quantized | 5338 | 38938 |
| Image Classification | 3173 | 18948 |
| Image Segmentation | 4916 | 55109 |
| Image Super Resolution | 7407 | 55109 |
| Face Detection | 8201 | 114685 |
| Pose Estimation | 27221 | 344729 |
| Text Classification | 1675 | 4464 |
| Machine Translation | 2607 | 8184 |
| Object Detection | 4123 | 27802 |
| Depth Estimation | 11660 | 85572 |
| Style Transfer | 55570 | 687080 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | — | 34140 |
| 1440p Vulkan | — | 25722 |
| 2160p Vulkan | — | 14577 |
| 1080p OpenGL | — | 29565 |
| 1440p OpenGL | — | 23398 |
| 2160p OpenGL | — | 14161 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce GTX 980 Ti AND GeForce RTX 5090
The charts below visualize how GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce RTX 5090 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce GTX 980 Ti was released 9 years, 7 months, 28 days earlier than GeForce RTX 5090.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce RTX 5090
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 5090 dominates overall compared to the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.