Intel Core Ultra 5 245K VS Intel Core i5 14500
We are comparing the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K ( Intel ) head-to-head with the Intel Core i5 14500 ( Intel ) . You will get the key pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Note: This comparison of Intel Core Ultra 5 245K vs. Intel Core i5 14500 is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Intel Core Ultra 5 245K AND Intel Core i5 14500
Here’s how Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and Intel Core i5 14500 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to quickly see where each CPU leads.
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
-
4% higher P-core turbo frequency (5200 MHz vs 5000 MHz)
-
24% higher E-core turbo frequency (4600 MHz vs 3700 MHz)
-
62% higher P-core base frequency (4200 MHz vs 2600 MHz)
-
89% higher E-core base frequency (3600 MHz vs 1900 MHz)
-
18% higher Geekbench V6 multi-core score (17863 vs 15155)
-
14% higher Geekbench V6 single-core score (2981 vs 2611)
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5 14500
-
43% more CPU threads (20 vs 14)
-
100% more performance-core threads (12 vs 6)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra 5 245K AND Intel Core i5 14500
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and Intel Core i5 14500.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Intel Core i5 14500 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Intel Core i5 14500 |
| Vendor: | Intel | Intel |
| Release Date: | October 11, 2024 | January 9, 2024 |
| Type: | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Arrow Lake | Raptor Lake Refresh |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Transistor Count: | 17.8 billion | — |
| TDP (PL1): | 125 W | 65 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | 159 W | 154 W |
| Socket: | FCLGA-1851 | LGA-1700 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 105 C | 100 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 14 | 14 |
| Total Threads | 14 | 20 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 6 | 6 |
| P-Threads | 6 | 12 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 5200 MHz | 5000 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 8 | 8 |
| E-Threads | 8 | 8 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 3600 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 4600 MHz | 3700 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Unlocked | Locked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max Memory Size: | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory Bandwidth: | — | 76.8 GB/s |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
| Technologies: | ABM, ADX, AVX-VNNI, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost 3.0, F16C, SHA, CFET, EIST, TBT 2.0, Thread Director, VT-d, VT-rp, VT-x, MBEC, RDRAND, SIPP, TDT, TXT, XD bit, vPro | ABM, ADX, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, F16C, SHA, EIST, TBT 2.0, TSX, VT-d, VT-x, RDRAND, TXT, XD bit, vPro |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 17863 | 15155 |
| Single-Core | 2981 | 2611 |
| File Compression | 1370 | 1200 |
| Clang Compression | 144 | 113 |
| HTML5 Browser | 404 | 393 |
| PDF Renderer | 470 | 437 |
| Text Processing | 338 | 264 |
| Background Blur | 86 | 64 |
| Photo Processing | 151 | 135 |
| Ray Tracing | 30 | 27 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| CPU Mark | 43235 | 30980 |
| Single-Core | 4711 | 3949 |
| Integer Math | — | 108300 |
| Floating Point | — | 79800 |
| Prime Numbers | — | 108 |
| String Sorting | — | 41300 |
| Data Encryption | — | 21600 |
| Data Compression | — | 373600 |
| Physics | — | 1781 |
| Extended Instructions | — | 22600 |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 1518 | 1145 |
| Single-Core | 136 | 110 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | 322 | 258 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra 5 245K AND Intel Core i5 14500
The charts below visualize how Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and Intel Core i5 14500 stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Release Timeline of Intel Core Ultra 5 245K and Intel Core i5 14500
Intel Core i5 14500 was released 9 months, 2 days earlier than Intel Core Ultra 5 245K.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Intel Core i5 14500
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is slightly better overall compared to the Intel Core i5 14500. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.