Intel Core Ultra 5 235H VS Intel Core 7 250H
We are comparing the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (Intel) with the Intel Core 7 250H (Intel). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each processor, in-depth specs, and benchmark comparisons.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Intel Core Ultra 5 235H AND Intel Core 7 250H
Here’s how Intel Core Ultra 5 235H and Intel Core 7 250H stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
-
10% higher E-core turbo frequency (4400 MHz vs 4000 MHz)
-
25% more efficient-core threads (10 vs 8)
-
25% more efficient cores (10 vs 8)
-
6% higher PassMark single-core score (4359 vs 4109)
-
31% more memory bandwidth (134.4 GB/s vs 102.4 GB/s)
-
70% smaller manufacturing process (3 nm vs 10 nm)
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 7 250H
-
43% more CPU threads (20 vs 14)
-
8% higher P-core turbo frequency (5400 MHz vs 5000 MHz)
-
200% more performance-core threads (12 vs 4)
-
50% more performance cores (6 vs 4)
-
4% higher P-core base frequency (2500 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
-
5% higher Geekbench V6 multi-core score (14357 vs 13629)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra 5 235H AND Intel Core 7 250H
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Intel Core Ultra 5 235H and Intel Core 7 250H.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that CPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Intel Core Ultra 5 235H | Intel Core 7 250H |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| CPU Name: | Intel Core Ultra 5 235H | Intel Core 7 250H |
| Vendor: | Intel | Intel |
| Release Date: | January 6, 2025 | December 18, 2024 |
| Generation: | Core Ultra Series 2 | Intel Core Series 2 |
| Type: | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set: | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename: | Arrow Lake | Raptor Lake |
| Foundry: | TSMC | Intel |
|
Package and Thermals
|
||
| Manufacturing Process: | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| TDP (PL1): | 20-28 W | 35-45 W |
| Max Boost TDP (PL2): | 115 W | 115 W |
| Socket: | FCBGA2049 | BGA-1744 |
| Max Temp (TJMax): | 110 C | 100 C |
|
CPU Cores
|
||
|
Total Cores
|
||
| Total Cores | 14 | 14 |
| Total Threads | 14 | 20 |
|
P-Cores
|
||
| P-Cores | 4 | 6 |
| P-Threads | 4 | 12 |
| P-Core Base Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| P-Core Turbo Frequency | 5000 MHz | 5400 MHz |
|
E-Cores
|
||
| E-Cores | 10 | 8 |
| E-Threads | 10 | 8 |
| E-Core Base Frequency | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| E-Core Turbo Frequency | 4400 MHz | 4000 MHz |
|
NPU
|
||
| NPU |
|
|
| NPU TOPS | 13 TOPS | — |
|
Cache and Bus
|
||
| Multiplier | Locked | Locked |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB | 24 MB |
|
Memory Support
|
||
| Memory Types: | LPDDR5-8400, LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6400, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-6400, LPDDR5x-6400, LPDDR4x-4267 |
| Max Memory Size: | 128 GB | 96 GB |
| Memory Channels: | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory Bandwidth: | 134.4 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| ECC Support: |
|
|
| Technologies: | Intel AI Boost, Intel DL Boost, Thread Director, Speed Shift, TBT 2.0, VT-d, VT-x, AES-NI, AVX2, RDRAND, TXT, XD bit | ABM, ADX, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, DLBoost, F16C, IPU 6.0, SHA, EIST, TBT 2.0, TBT 3.0, TSX, VT-d, VT-x, RDRAND, TXT, XD bit |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
Geekbench V6
|
||
| Multi-Core | 13629 | 14357 |
| Single-Core | 2706 | 2746 |
| File Compression | 1020 | 1220 |
| Clang Compression | 117 | 104 |
| HTML5 Browser | 290 | 354 |
| PDF Renderer | 335 | 409 |
| Text Processing | 283 | 247 |
| Background Blur | 66 | 54 |
| Photo Processing | 115 | 134 |
| Ray Tracing | 24 | 23 |
|
PassMark CPU
|
||
| Multi-Core | 30151 | 27165 |
| Single-Core | 4359 | 4109 |
| Integer Math | 74300 | 99800 |
| Floating Point | 93600 | 66200 |
| Prime Numbers | 240 | 104 |
| String Sorting | 36300 | 34300 |
| Data Encryption | 23200 | 18300 |
| Data Compression | 302900 | 307600 |
| Physics | 1985 | 1784 |
| Extended Instructions | 23400 | 17700 |
|
Cinebench 2024
|
||
| Multi-Core | 979 | 1113 |
| Single-Core | 122 | 122 |
|
Blender
|
||
| Render Score | 191 | 201 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Intel Core Ultra 5 235H AND Intel Core 7 250H
The charts below visualize how Intel Core Ultra 5 235H and Intel Core 7 250H stack up in key performance metrics.
Performance Radar Chart
Performance Benchmarks
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which CPU gives better value.
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
Intel Core 7 250H
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, this is a close match and neither CPU clearly wins overall. Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is stronger in CPU Architecture and Memory Architecture. Intel Core 7 250H is stronger in Single-Core Performance and Multi-Core Performance. They are about even in Energy Efficiency. Pick based on what you value most day to day.
Try to Compare Again One of These CPUs With Another CPU
Pick which CPU to keep, then search for the other CPU to compare.
Frequently Asked Questions about Intel Core Ultra 5 235H vs Intel Core 7 250H
Intel Core 7 250H scores 1.5% higher than Intel Core Ultra 5 235H in Geekbench 6 single-core (2,746 vs 2,706). Intel Core 7 250H scores 5.3% higher than Intel Core Ultra 5 235H in Geekbench 6 multi-core (14,357 vs 13,629).
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H and Intel Core 7 250H both score 122 in Cinebench 2024 single-core. Intel Core 7 250H scores 13.7% higher than Intel Core Ultra 5 235H in Cinebench 2024 multi-core (1,113 vs 979).
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H scores 11% higher than Intel Core 7 250H in PassMark CPU multi-core (30,151 vs 27,165).
Both list 14 for CPU cores. Intel Core Ultra 5 235H has 14 CPU threads, while Intel Core 7 250H has 20 CPU threads.
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H lists FCBGA2049 for socket, while Intel Core 7 250H lists BGA-1744 for socket.
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H lists LPDDR5-8400, LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 for memory types, while Intel Core 7 250H lists DDR5-6400, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-6400, LPDDR5x-6400, LPDDR4x-4267 for memory types. Intel Core Ultra 5 235H lists 128 GB for maximum memory capacity, while Intel Core 7 250H lists 96 GB for maximum memory capacity.
Both Intel Core Ultra 5 235H and Intel Core 7 250H have integrated graphics.
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H lists 20-28 W for PL1 power limit, while Intel Core 7 250H lists 35-45 W for PL1 power limit. Both list 115 W for PL2 power limit.
Both list 2 MB for L2 cache. Intel Core Ultra 5 235H lists 18 MB for L3 cache, while Intel Core 7 250H lists 24 MB for L3 cache.
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H was released on January 6, 2025. Intel Core 7 250H was released on December 18, 2024. Intel Core Ultra 5 235H was released 19 days after Intel Core 7 250H.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.