ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro VS Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max
We are comparing the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro (ZTE) with the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max (Xiaomi). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro AND Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max
Here’s how ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro and Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro
-
16% higher AnTuTu v11 score (4416758 vs 3803420)
-
20% higher single-core Geekbench score (3940 vs 3289)
-
26% higher multi-core Geekbench score (12509 vs 9958)
-
Phone unlock via face
-
Includes headphone jack
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max
-
15% smoother display (165 Hz vs 144 Hz)
-
14% larger battery (8550 mAh vs 7500 mAh)
-
Higher resolution (1280 x 2772 pixels)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 20 MP
-
100% more storage (1 TB vs 512GB)
-
25% faster charging (100 W vs 80 W)
-
94% brighter (3500 nits vs 1800 nits)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro AND Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max
Below is the detailed specification table comparing ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro and Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Release Date: | June 10, 2026 | April 21, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 9500 |
| GPU: | Adreno 840 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 230 g | 227 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.85 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1216 x 2688 pixels | 1280 x 2772 pixels |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 431 | 447 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 144 | 165 |
| Display Brightness: | 1800 nits | 3500 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP + 50 MP + 2 MP | 50 MP + 8 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | Dual LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60/240 fps | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60/960 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 1080p at 30/60 fps | 1080p at 30/60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.68 |
| Focal Length | — | 24 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50A | Light Hunter 800 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.55" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 13 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50E40 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.88" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 0.61 micron | 1.14 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Image Resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV16A1Q | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.06" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | — |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 7500 mAh | 8550 mAh |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 80W | 100W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3940 | 3289 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 12509 | 9958 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 4416758 | 3803420 |
| CPU | 1322336 | 1099801 |
| GPU | 1584178 | 1375013 |
| MEM | 565956 | 513398 |
| UX | 944288 | 815208 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 4004107 | 3340196 |
| CPU | 1177510 | 975847 |
| GPU | 1402206 | 1334740 |
| MEM | 501463 | 388222 |
| UX | 922928 | 641387 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | 3.5 mm jack | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro AND Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max
The charts below visualize how ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro and Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro AND Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max
Here’s a proportional visualization of the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro’s 6.85 inches screen compared to the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max’s 6.83 inches display.
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro
6.85 inches″
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max
6.83 inches″
Release Timeline of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro and Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max was released 1 month, 20 days earlier than ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Max has a narrow overall lead compared to the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro. Its strongest advantages are in Display and Battery. The ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro is the better fit if your top priority is Performance.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.