ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro VS Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
We are comparing the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro (ZTE) with the Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Xiaomi). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro AND Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
Here’s how ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro and Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
47% higher AnTuTu v11 score (4416758 vs 3006210)
-
47% higher single-core Geekbench score (3940 vs 2678)
-
33% more RAM (16GB vs 12GB)
-
47% higher multi-core Geekbench score (12509 vs 8486)
-
125% brighter (1800 nits vs 800 nits)
-
Supports NFC
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
-
13% larger battery (8500 mAh vs 7500 mAh)
-
Higher resolution (1280 x 2772 pixels)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 20 MP
-
25% faster charging (100 W vs 80 W)
-
5% lighter at 218g
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro AND Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
Below is the detailed specification table comparing ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro and Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | ZTE | Xiaomi |
| Release Date: | June 10, 2026 | March 17, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 9500s |
| GPU: | Adreno 840 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 230 g | 218 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.85 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1216 x 2688 pixels | 1280 x 2772 pixels |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 431 | 447 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 144 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 1800 nits | 800 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP + 50 MP + 2 MP | 50 MP + 8 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | Dual LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60/240 fps | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60/960 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 1080p at 30/60 fps | 1080p at 30/60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 |
| Focal Length | — | 26 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50A | Light Fusion 600 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.95" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 13 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50E40 | SmartSens SC821CS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.88" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 0.61 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Image Resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | — | 25 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV16A1Q | OmniVision OV20B |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.06" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 7500 mAh | 8500 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 41 |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 80W | 100W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage: | 512 GB, 256 GB | 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3940 | 2678 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 12509 | 8486 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 4416758 | 3006210 |
| CPU | 1322336 | 927390 |
| GPU | 1584178 | 977668 |
| MEM | 565956 | 451937 |
| UX | 944288 | 649215 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 4004107 | 3298445 |
| CPU | 1177510 | 952789 |
| GPU | 1402206 | 1130421 |
| MEM | 501463 | 502375 |
| UX | 922928 | 712860 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | 3.5 mm jack | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro AND Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
The charts below visualize how ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro and Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro AND Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
Here’s a proportional visualization of the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro’s 6.85 inches screen compared to the Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max’s 6.83 inches display.
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro
6.85 inches″
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
6.83 inches″
Release Timeline of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro and Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max was released 2 months, 24 days earlier than ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro has a narrow overall lead compared to the Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Camera. The Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max is the better fit if your top priority is Battery.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.