Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max VS Vivo iQOO Z11
We are comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (Xiaomi) with the Vivo iQOO Z11 (Vivo). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max AND Vivo iQOO Z11
Here’s how Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max and Vivo iQOO Z11 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
-
11% larger battery (10000 mAh vs 9020 mAh)
-
Higher resolution (1280 x 2772)
-
11% higher multi-core Geekbench score (3481 vs 3129)
-
100% more storage (512GB vs 256GB)
-
11% faster charging (100 W vs 90 W)
-
338% brighter (3500 nits vs 800 nits)
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO Z11
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
10% higher single-core Geekbench score (1205 vs 1099)
-
7% lighter at 213g
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max AND Vivo iQOO Z11
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max and Vivo iQOO Z11.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max | Vivo iQOO Z11 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Release Date: | August 28, 2026 | May 6, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
| GPU: | Qualcomm Adreno | Adreno 810 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 229.5 g | 213 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.83 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1280 x 2772 | 1260 x 2800 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 447 | 450 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | 1060 nits (typical), 2000 nits (HBM), 3500 nits (peak) | 800 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, HDR, panorama, Pro mode | LED flash, bokeh mode, Pro mode, RAW support |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60/240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps | 4K at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 26 mm | — |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.95" |
| Pixel Size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | OIS |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Stabilization | No | — |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | — |
| Pixel Size | 0.61 micron | — |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 10000 mAh | 9020 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 50 | — |
| Battery Type: | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 100W | 90W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB, 8 GB | 12 GB, 8 GB |
| Storage: | 512 GB, 256 GB, 128 GB | 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1099 | 1205 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3481 | 3129 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1010104 | 1053406 |
| CPU | 346157 | 413296 |
| GPU | 215763 | 193287 |
| MEM | 196548 | 162287 |
| UX | 251636 | 284536 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1017783 | — |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max AND Vivo iQOO Z11
The charts below visualize how Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max and Vivo iQOO Z11 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max AND Vivo iQOO Z11
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max’s 6.83 inches screen compared to the Vivo iQOO Z11’s 6.83 inches display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
6.83 inches″
Vivo iQOO Z11
6.83 inches″
Release Timeline of Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max and Vivo iQOO Z11
Vivo iQOO Z11 was released 3 months, 22 days earlier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Vivo iQOO Z11
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max has a narrow overall lead compared to the Vivo iQOO Z11. Its strongest advantages are in Display and Battery. They are still fairly close in Performance and Camera.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.