Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G VS vivo V70 Elite
We are comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Xiaomi) with the vivo V70 Elite (Vivo). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G AND vivo V70 Elite
Here’s how Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G and vivo V70 Elite stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
1% larger battery (6580 mAh vs 6500 mAh)
-
Higher resolution (1280 x 2772)
-
4% larger display (6.83 inches vs 6.59 inches)
Reasons to consider the vivo V70 Elite
-
95% higher AnTuTu v11 score (1808954 vs 927175)
-
58% higher single-core Geekbench score (1930 vs 1221)
-
50% more RAM (12GB vs 8GB)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
52% higher multi-core Geekbench score (4817 vs 3174)
-
300% more storage (512GB vs 128GB)
-
100% faster charging (90 W vs 45 W)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G AND vivo V70 Elite
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G and vivo V70 Elite.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | vivo V70 Elite |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Release Date: | January 6, 2026 | February 26, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| GPU: | Adreno 830 | Adreno 735 |
| Operating System: | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 210 g | 187 g or 194 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.83 inches | 6.59 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1280 x 2772 | 1260 x 2750 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 447 | 459 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | — | 1800 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Dual Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | Zeiss optics, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR, color spectrum sensor |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 720p at 240 fps | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 1080p at 60 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.9 |
| Focal Length | 25 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | — | 50 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.7 |
| Focal Length | — | 85 mm |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/1.95" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | — | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 25 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6580 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 27 | — |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 90W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB | 12 GB, 8 GB |
| Storage: | 128 GB | 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1221 | 1930 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3174 | 4817 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 927175 | 1808954 |
| CPU | 324188 | 542470 |
| GPU | 147261 | 494548 |
| MEM | 182022 | 317309 |
| UX | 273704 | 454627 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2723036 | 1478090 |
| CPU | 624873 | 400102 |
| GPU | 1217691 | 521384 |
| MEM | 449196 | 285301 |
| UX | 431276 | 271303 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G AND vivo V70 Elite
The charts below visualize how Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G and vivo V70 Elite stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G AND vivo V70 Elite
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G’s 6.83 inches screen compared to the vivo V70 Elite’s 6.59 inches display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
6.83 inches″
vivo V70 Elite
6.59 inches″
Release Timeline of Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G and vivo V70 Elite
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G was released 1 month, 20 days earlier than vivo V70 Elite.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
vivo V70 Elite
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the vivo V70 Elite edges out overall compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Camera and Battery. They are still fairly close in Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.