Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro VS Infinix GT 50 Pro
We are comparing the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro ( Xiaomi ) head-to-head with the Infinix GT 50 Pro ( Infinix ) . You'll get the key pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Note: This comparison of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro vs. Infinix GT 50 Pro is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro AND Infinix GT 50 Pro
Here’s how Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Infinix GT 50 Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which phone excels where.
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
-
Higher resolution (1220 x 2712)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 20 MP
-
100% faster charging (90 W vs 45 W)
-
2% lighter at 195g
Reasons to consider the Infinix GT 50 Pro
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
8% larger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000 mAh)
-
11% higher AnTuTu v11 score (2137843 vs 1925109)
-
4% higher single-core Geekbench score (1621 vs 1564)
-
50% more RAM (12GB vs 8GB)
-
7% higher multi-core Geekbench score (6535 vs 6109)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30 fps
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro AND Infinix GT 50 Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Infinix GT 50 Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro | Infinix GT 50 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Xiaomi | Infinix |
| Release Date: | January 9, 2025 | April 1, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 8400 | Dimensity 8400 |
| GPU: | Mali-G720 MC7 | Mali-G720 MC7 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 195 g | 198 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.67 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1220 x 2712 | 1208 x 2644 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 446 | 440 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | 1400 nits | 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Dual LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | Dual LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 60 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, slow motion at 960 fps | 4K at 60 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 1080p slow motion at 240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 20 MP | 13 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 1080p at 30 fps | 4K at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 26 mm | — |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Pixel Size | 0.8 micron | — |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | — |
| Sensor | SmartSens SC820CS | GalaxyCore GC08A8 |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 20 MP | 13 MP |
| Image Resolution | 5184 x 3888 | — |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | — |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV20B | GalaxyCore GC13A0 |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | 1/3.1" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 23 | — |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Charging Speed: | 90W | 45W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB | 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1564 | 1621 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 6109 | 6535 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1925109 | 2137843 |
| CPU | 604919 | 648630 |
| GPU | 599014 | 648885 |
| MEM | 299603 | 389995 |
| UX | 386377 | 450333 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro AND Infinix GT 50 Pro
The charts below visualize how Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Infinix GT 50 Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro AND Infinix GT 50 Pro
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro’s 6.67 inches screen compared to the Infinix GT 50 Pro’s 6.78 inches display. Each rectangle is scaled so you can see at a glance which phone offers a larger viewing area.
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
6.67 inches″
Infinix GT 50 Pro
6.78 inches″
Release Timeline of Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro and Infinix GT 50 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro was released 1 year, 2 months, 23 days earlier than Infinix GT 50 Pro.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Infinix GT 50 Pro
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Infinix GT 50 Pro edges out overall compared to the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.