Xiaomi 18 Fold VS Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
We are comparing the Xiaomi 18 Fold (Xiaomi) with the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (Google). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Xiaomi 18 Fold AND Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Here’s how Xiaomi 18 Fold and Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 18 Fold
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
25% larger battery (6000 mAh vs 4806 mAh)
-
168% higher AnTuTu v11 score (5228014 vs 1951408)
-
44% higher single-core Geekbench score (3715 vs 2587)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 16 MP
-
161% higher multi-core Geekbench score (14213 vs 5446)
-
123% faster charging (67 W vs 30 W)
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
-
Higher resolution (2076 x 2152)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps
-
6% larger display (8 inches vs 7.58 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Xiaomi 18 Fold AND Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Xiaomi 18 Fold and Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Xiaomi 18 Fold | Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Xiaomi | |
| Release Date: | September 10, 2026 | August 20, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Xring O3 | Tensor G6 |
| GPU: | Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16 | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | Android 17 |
| Weight: | 219 g | 239 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 7.58 inches | 8.0 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 2364 x 1672 | 2076 x 2152 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 382 | 374 |
| Display Technology: | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO OLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 200 MP | 48 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 24 fps, 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/960 fps | 4K at 24/30/60 fps, 1080p at 24/30/60/120/240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 16 MP | 10 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 48 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 8000 x 6000 |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 0.5 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | OIS | OIS |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 10.8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1 |
| Focal Length | 80 mm | 112 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung S5K3J1 |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/3.2" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | OIS | OIS |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 10.5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 17 mm | — |
| Sensor | — | Samsung S5K3J1 |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/3.4" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | — | PDAF |
| Stabilization | — | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 16 MP | 10 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung S5K3K1 |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/3.94" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | — | PDAF |
| Stabilization | — | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6000 mAh | 4806 mAh |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Charging Speed: | 67W | 30W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3715 | 2587 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 14213 | 5446 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 5228014 | 1951408 |
| CPU | 1359147 | 890938 |
| GPU | 2143582 | 289193 |
| MEM | 941063 | 306874 |
| UX | 784222 | 464403 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | — | 1856183 |
| CPU | — | 840990 |
| GPU | — | 277185 |
| MEM | — | 292032 |
| UX | — | 445976 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Side Mounted |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Xiaomi 18 Fold AND Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
The charts below visualize how Xiaomi 18 Fold and Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Xiaomi 18 Fold AND Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Xiaomi 18 Fold’s 7.58 inches screen compared to the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold’s 8.0 inches display.
Xiaomi 18 Fold
7.58 inches″
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
8.0 inches″
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Xiaomi 18 Fold
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Xiaomi 18 Fold edges out overall compared to the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Battery. The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is the better fit if your top priority is Camera and Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.