Vivo X300 VS Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
We are comparing the Vivo X300 ( Vivo ) head-to-head with the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra ( Xiaomi ) . You'll get the key pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Note: This comparison of Vivo X300 vs. Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Vivo X300 AND Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Here’s how Vivo X300 and Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which phone excels where.
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300
-
Superior display technology (LTPO AMOLED)
-
33% more RAM (16GB vs 12GB)
-
Higher resolution (1216×2640)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
300% more storage (1 TB vs 256GB)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps
-
125% brighter (4500 nits vs 2000 nits)
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
-
8% larger battery (6500 mAh vs 6040 mAh)
-
12% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3862914 vs 3455738)
-
12% higher single-core Geekbench score (3777 vs 3383)
-
16% higher multi-core Geekbench score (11668 vs 10099)
-
11% faster charging (100 W vs 90 W)
-
9% larger display (6.9 inches vs 6.31 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Vivo X300 AND Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Vivo X300 and Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Vivo X300 | Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Release Date: | October 13, 2025 | November 26, 2025 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 190g | 218 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.31 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1216×2640 | 1200 x 2608 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 461 | 416 |
| Display Technology: | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 4500 nits | 2000 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens, HDR | Dual LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 60 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, slow motion at 1920 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 4K at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.68 | f/1.7 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HPB | OmniVision Light Hunter 950 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.31" |
| Pixel Size | 0.56 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | af/2.6 | f/3.0 |
| Focal Length | 70 mm | 115 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-602 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.95" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.8 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.88" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.61 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | — |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 20 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/3.44" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6040 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 27 | 33 |
| Battery Type: | Si-C Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 90W | 100W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3383 | 3777 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 10099 | 11668 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3455738 | 3862914 |
| CPU | 991635 | 1113289 |
| GPU | 1343858 | 1452771 |
| MEM | 348931 | 507250 |
| UX | 771314 | 789604 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 3380237 | 4004107 |
| CPU | 979188 | 1177510 |
| GPU | 1334640 | 1402206 |
| MEM | 354261 | 501463 |
| UX | 712148 | 922928 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Sim | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | 2.1 Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | — | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Vivo X300 AND Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
The charts below visualize how Vivo X300 and Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Vivo X300 AND Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Vivo X300’s 6.31 inches screen compared to the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra’s 6.9 inches display. Each rectangle is scaled so you can see at a glance which phone offers a larger viewing area.
Vivo X300
6.31 inches″
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
6.9 inches″
Release Timeline of Vivo X300 and Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Vivo X300 was released 1 month, 13 days earlier than Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Vivo X300
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra has a narrow overall lead compared to the Vivo X300. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Camera and Battery. The Vivo X300 is the better fit if your top priority is Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.