vivo X300 Ultra VS Xiaomi 17 Ultra
We are comparing the vivo X300 Ultra ( Vivo ) head-to-head with the Xiaomi 17 Ultra ( Xiaomi ) . You'll get the key pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Note: This comparison of vivo X300 Ultra vs. Xiaomi 17 Ultra is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
KEY DIFFERENCES OF vivo X300 Ultra AND Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Here’s how vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which phone excels where.
Reasons to consider the vivo X300 Ultra
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
10% larger battery (6600 mAh vs 6000 mAh)
-
Higher resolution (1440 x 3168)
-
11% faster charging (100 W vs 90 W)
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Ultra
-
6% higher multi-core Geekbench score (11259 vs 10653)
-
94% brighter (3500 nits vs 1800 nits)
-
8% lighter at 218.4g
-
1% larger display (6.9 inches vs 6.82 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF vivo X300 Ultra AND Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Below is the detailed specification table comparing vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Release Date: | April 3, 2026 | March 10, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 232 g or 237 g | 218.4 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.82 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1440 x 3168 | 1200 x 2608 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 510 | 416 |
| Display Technology: | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 144 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 1800 nits | 3500 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, Pro mode, RAW support |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 24/30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240/480/960/1920 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-901 | Omnivision Light Fusion 1050L |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.12" | 1/1" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 1.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.4 - 3.0 |
| Focal Length | 85 mm | 75-100 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HPB | Samsung ISOCELL HPE |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.4" |
| Pixel Size | 0.56 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Multi-directional PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 14 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.28" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN1 | Omnivision OV50M |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.7" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.61 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6600 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 57 | 31 |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 100W | 90W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | — | 166 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3621 | 3711 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 10653 | 11259 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 4152385 | 4250017 |
| CPU | 1110159 | 1370257 |
| GPU | 1516479 | 1454536 |
| MEM | 602280 | 538004 |
| UX | 923467 | 887220 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 4004107 | 3963774 |
| CPU | 1177510 | 1198653 |
| GPU | 1402206 | 1458267 |
| MEM | 501463 | 501472 |
| UX | 922928 | 805382 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF vivo X300 Ultra AND Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The charts below visualize how vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF vivo X300 Ultra AND Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Here’s a proportional visualization of the vivo X300 Ultra’s 6.82 inches screen compared to the Xiaomi 17 Ultra’s 6.9 inches display. Each rectangle is scaled so you can see at a glance which phone offers a larger viewing area.
vivo X300 Ultra
6.82 inches″
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
6.9 inches″
Release Timeline of vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Xiaomi 17 Ultra was released 24 days earlier than vivo X300 Ultra.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the vivo X300 Ultra edges out overall compared to the Xiaomi 17 Ultra. Its strongest advantages are in Camera and Battery. They are still fairly close in Performance and Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.