Vivo X300 Pro VS vivo X300 Ultra
We are comparing the Vivo X300 Pro (Vivo) with the vivo X300 Ultra (Vivo). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Vivo X300 Pro AND vivo X300 Ultra
Here’s how Vivo X300 Pro and vivo X300 Ultra stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Pro
-
150% brighter (4500 nits vs 1800 nits)
-
5% lighter at 226g
Reasons to consider the vivo X300 Ultra
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
1% larger battery (6600 mAh vs 6510 mAh)
-
13% higher AnTuTu v11 score (4152385 vs 3658712)
-
Higher resolution (1440 x 3168)
-
11% faster charging (100 W vs 90 W)
-
1% larger display (6.82 inches vs 6.78 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Vivo X300 Pro AND vivo X300 Ultra
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Vivo X300 Pro and vivo X300 Ultra.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Vivo | Vivo |
| Release Date: | October 17, 2025 | April 3, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 226g | 232 g or 237 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.78 inches | 6.82 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1260×2800 | 1440 x 3168 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 453 | 510 |
| Display Technology: | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | 4500 nits | 1800 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 24/30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | 50 MP | f/1.9 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 35 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-828 | Sony LYT-901 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.12" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.7 |
| Focal Length | 85 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HPB | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.4" |
| Pixel Size | 0.56 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | — | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony LYT-818 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.28" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | — | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Focal Length | 20 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung ISOCELL JN1 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6510 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 31 | 57 |
| Battery Type: | Si-C Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 90W | 100W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | 171 | — |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3563 | 3621 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 10512 | 10653 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3658712 | 4152385 |
| CPU | 1062762 | 1110159 |
| GPU | 1342762 | 1516479 |
| MEM | 466511 | 602280 |
| UX | 786677 | 923467 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 3539789 | 4004107 |
| CPU | 1039348 | 1177510 |
| GPU | 1371288 | 1402206 |
| MEM | 383559 | 501463 |
| UX | 745594 | 922928 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Sim | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | — | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Vivo X300 Pro AND vivo X300 Ultra
The charts below visualize how Vivo X300 Pro and vivo X300 Ultra stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Vivo X300 Pro AND vivo X300 Ultra
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Vivo X300 Pro’s 6.78 inches screen compared to the vivo X300 Ultra’s 6.82 inches display.
Vivo X300 Pro
6.78 inches″
vivo X300 Ultra
6.82 inches″
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Vivo X300 Pro
vivo X300 Ultra
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the vivo X300 Ultra edges out overall compared to the Vivo X300 Pro. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Camera and Battery. They are still fairly close in Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.