vivo X300 FE VS Samsung Galaxy S26
We are comparing the vivo X300 FE (Vivo) with the Samsung Galaxy S26 (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF vivo X300 FE AND Samsung Galaxy S26
Here’s how vivo X300 FE and Samsung Galaxy S26 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the vivo X300 FE
-
51% larger battery (6500 mAh vs 4300 mAh)
-
Higher resolution (1216 x 2640)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
260% faster charging (90 W vs 25 W)
-
12% higher AnTuTu score (4004107 vs 3586464)
-
Dual SIM support
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S26
-
Superior display technology (Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X)
-
20% higher single-core Geekbench score (3378 vs 2818)
-
23% higher multi-core Geekbench score (11097 vs 9052)
-
44% brighter (2600 nits vs 1800 nits)
-
13% lighter at 167g
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF vivo X300 FE AND Samsung Galaxy S26
Below is the detailed specification table comparing vivo X300 FE and Samsung Galaxy S26.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | vivo X300 FE | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Vivo | Samsung |
| Release Date: | March 4, 2026 | March 6, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 190 g or 191 g | 167 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.31 inches | 6.3 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1216 x 2640 | 1080 x 2340 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 461 | 409 |
| Display Technology: | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 1800 nits | 2600 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Multi-focus LED flash, panorama, HDR | Best Face, Horizon Lock, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama, Pro mode, RAW support, Super Steady video |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 60 fps, 1080p at 60 fps | 8K at 24/30fps, 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 60 fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 8160 x 6120 |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.0 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 10 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 70 mm | 67 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Samsung ISOCELL S5K3K1 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.95" | 1/3.94" |
| Pixel Size | 0.8 micron | 1.0 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | — | Sony IMX564 |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | 1/2.55" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 1.4 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung S5K3LU |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/3.2" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | AF | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6500 mAh | 4300 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 30 |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 90W | 25W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage: | 512 GB, 256 GB | 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2818 | 3378 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 9052 | 11097 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 2869139 | 2993684 |
| CPU | 861821 | 984024 |
| GPU | 1005345 | 1140841 |
| MEM | 381541 | 413795 |
| UX | 620432 | 455024 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 4004107 | 3586464 |
| CPU | 1177510 | 1039672 |
| GPU | 1402206 | 1390228 |
| MEM | 501463 | 419821 |
| UX | 922928 | 736743 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF vivo X300 FE AND Samsung Galaxy S26
The charts below visualize how vivo X300 FE and Samsung Galaxy S26 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF vivo X300 FE AND Samsung Galaxy S26
Here’s a proportional visualization of the vivo X300 FE’s 6.31 inches screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy S26’s 6.3 inches display.
vivo X300 FE
6.31 inches″
Samsung Galaxy S26
6.3 inches″
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
vivo X300 FE
Samsung Galaxy S26
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the vivo X300 FE has a narrow overall lead compared to the Samsung Galaxy S26. Its strongest advantages are in Camera and Battery. The Samsung Galaxy S26 is the better fit if your top priority is Performance and Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.