vivo X200T VS Xiaomi 17T Pro
We are comparing the vivo X200T (Vivo) with the Xiaomi 17T Pro (Xiaomi). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF vivo X200T AND Xiaomi 17T Pro
Here’s how vivo X200T and Xiaomi 17T Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the vivo X200T
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps
-
167% brighter (1600 nits vs 600 nits)
-
6% lighter at 205g
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17T Pro
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
13% larger battery (7000 mAh vs 6200 mAh)
-
22% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3323591 vs 2725989)
-
22% higher single-core Geekbench score (3099 vs 2546)
-
Higher resolution (1280 x 2772 pixels)
-
14% higher multi-core Geekbench score (9438 vs 8314)
-
100% more storage (1 TB vs 512GB)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF vivo X200T AND Xiaomi 17T Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing vivo X200T and Xiaomi 17T Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | vivo X200T | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Release Date: | February 3, 2026 | May 28, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 9400 Plus | Dimensity 9500 |
| GPU: | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 203 g or 205 g | 219 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.67 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1260 x 2800 | 1280 x 2772 pixels |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 460 | 447 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | 1600 nits | 600 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP + 50 MP + 12 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode, RAW support |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240/960 fps, 720p at 1920 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.67 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Light Fusion 950 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.31" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/3.0 |
| Focal Length | 70 mm | 115 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.95" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.8 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | — |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung JD1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.14" | 1/3.06" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | — |
| Autofocus | AF | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Image Resolution | 6528 x 4896 | — |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 20 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung KD1 | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.44" | 1/3.44" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6200 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 37 |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 90W | 100W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage: | 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2546 | 3099 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 8314 | 9438 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 2725989 | 3323591 |
| CPU | 800906 | 933780 |
| GPU | 988549 | 1300550 |
| MEM | 371345 | 397001 |
| UX | 565189 | 692260 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2687158 | 3340196 |
| CPU | 577773 | 975847 |
| GPU | 1218636 | 1334740 |
| MEM | 438667 | 388222 |
| UX | 452082 | 641387 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF vivo X200T AND Xiaomi 17T Pro
The charts below visualize how vivo X200T and Xiaomi 17T Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF vivo X200T AND Xiaomi 17T Pro
Here’s a proportional visualization of the vivo X200T’s 6.67 inches screen compared to the Xiaomi 17T Pro’s 6.83 inches display.
vivo X200T
6.67 inches″
Xiaomi 17T Pro
6.83 inches″
Release Timeline of vivo X200T and Xiaomi 17T Pro
vivo X200T was released 3 months, 25 days earlier than Xiaomi 17T Pro.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
vivo X200T
Xiaomi 17T Pro
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Xiaomi 17T Pro has a narrow overall lead compared to the vivo X200T. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Battery. The vivo X200T is the better fit if your top priority is Camera.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.