Vivo X200 Ultra VS Xiaomi 15 Ultra
We are comparing the Vivo X200 Ultra ( Vivo ) head-to-head with the Xiaomi 15 Ultra ( Xiaomi ) . You'll get the key pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Note: This comparison of Vivo X200 Ultra vs. Xiaomi 15 Ultra is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Vivo X200 Ultra AND Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Here’s how Vivo X200 Ultra and Xiaomi 15 Ultra stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which phone excels where.
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Ultra
-
11% larger battery (6000 mAh vs 5410 mAh)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
4% higher multi-core Geekbench score (9393 vs 9055)
-
11% higher AnTuTu score (2818957 vs 2544373)
-
41% brighter (4500 nits vs 3200 nits)
-
1% larger display (6.82 inches vs 6.73 inches)
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 15 Ultra
-
Higher resolution (1440×3200)
-
1% lighter at 226g
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Vivo X200 Ultra AND Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Vivo X200 Ultra and Xiaomi 15 Ultra.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Vivo X200 Ultra | Xiaomi 15 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Release Date: | April 29, 2025 | February 27, 2025 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| GPU: | Adreno 830 | Adreno 830 |
| Operating System: | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Weight: | 229g | 226g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.82 inches | 6.73 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1440×3168 | 1440×3200 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 510 | 521 |
| Display Technology: | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 4500 nits | 3200 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Quad Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Zeiss T* coatings, Zeiss Co-Engineered Triple Camera System | Leica Color, Super Macro, Master Portrait |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 30fps, 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 8K at 30fps, 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.63 |
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Sony LYT-900 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.0" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 1.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.6 |
| Focal Length | 85 mm | 100 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP9 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.4" |
| Pixel Size | 0.56 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 14 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.28" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN1 | Omnivision OV32B |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/3.14" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6000 mAh | 5410 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 29 | 25 |
| Battery Type: | Si-C Li-Ion | Si-C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 90W | 90W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | 167 | 159 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3071 | 3032 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 9393 | 9055 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3092340 | 2985023 |
| CPU | 819790 | 896407 |
| GPU | 1185591 | 1084452 |
| MEM | 429927 | 416654 |
| UX | 657032 | 587510 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2818957 | 2544373 |
| CPU | 621256 | 558586 |
| GPU | 1259798 | 1040161 |
| MEM | 495183 | 520300 |
| UX | 442720 | 425326 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Sim | Dual Sim |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Vivo X200 Ultra AND Xiaomi 15 Ultra
The charts below visualize how Vivo X200 Ultra and Xiaomi 15 Ultra stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Vivo X200 Ultra AND Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Vivo X200 Ultra’s 6.82 inches screen compared to the Xiaomi 15 Ultra’s 6.73 inches display. Each rectangle is scaled so you can see at a glance which phone offers a larger viewing area.
Vivo X200 Ultra
6.82 inches″
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
6.73 inches″
Release Timeline of Vivo X200 Ultra and Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Xiaomi 15 Ultra was released 2 months, 2 days earlier than Vivo X200 Ultra.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Vivo X200 Ultra
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Vivo X200 Ultra has a narrow overall lead compared to the Xiaomi 15 Ultra. Its strongest advantages are in Camera, Display and Battery. They are still fairly close in Performance.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.