Vivo iQOO 16 VS Google Pixel 11 Pro
We are comparing the Vivo iQOO 16 (Vivo) with the Google Pixel 11 Pro (Google). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Vivo iQOO 16 AND Google Pixel 11 Pro
Here’s how Vivo iQOO 16 and Google Pixel 11 Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 16
-
38% smoother display (165 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
73% larger battery (8400 mAh vs 4850 mAh)
-
186% higher AnTuTu v11 score (5498720 vs 1925523)
-
40% higher single-core Geekbench score (3764 vs 2688)
-
Higher resolution (1440 x 3168)
-
69% higher multi-core Geekbench score (11619 vs 6871)
-
233% faster charging (100 W vs 30 W)
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 11 Pro
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 42 MP
-
11% lighter at 204g
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Vivo iQOO 16 AND Google Pixel 11 Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Vivo iQOO 16 and Google Pixel 11 Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 16 | Google Pixel 11 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Vivo | |
| Release Date: | September 29, 2026 | August 20, 2026 |
| Mobile Chipset: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Tensor G6 |
| GPU: | Adreno 850 | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | Android 17 |
| Weight: | 222.5 g, 227.9 g, 229.8 g (by finish) | 204 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.85 inches | 6.3 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1440 x 3168 | 1280 x 2856 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 508 | 497 |
| Display Technology: | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO OLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 165 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 1100 nits | — |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, Pro mode, RAW support | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60/240 fps | 8K at 24/30 fps, 4K at 24/30/60 fps, 1080p at 24/30/60/120/240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 32 MP | 42 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 60 fps | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.68 | f/1.7 |
| Focal Length | — | 25 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50Q | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.3" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Multi-directional PDAF |
| Stabilization | OIS | OIS |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.65 | f/2.8 |
| Focal Length | 85 mm | 106 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.95" |
| Pixel Size | 0.8 micron | — |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | OIS | OIS |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.05 | f/1.7 |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | — |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC50D1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.51" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | — |
| Autofocus | — | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 32 MP | 42 MP |
| Image Resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | 17 mm |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC32E1 | Sony IMX858 |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.1" | 1/2.51" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | No | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 8400 mAh | 4850 mAh |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 100W | 30W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3764 | 2688 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 11619 | 6871 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 5498720 | 1925523 |
| CPU | 1512400 | 873099 |
| GPU | 2045600 | 286837 |
| MEM | 738900 | 301575 |
| UX | 1201820 | 464012 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 5195978 | 1856183 |
| CPU | 1407243 | 840990 |
| GPU | 1940214 | 277185 |
| MEM | 739539 | 292032 |
| UX | 1108982 | 445976 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Vivo iQOO 16 AND Google Pixel 11 Pro
The charts below visualize how Vivo iQOO 16 and Google Pixel 11 Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Vivo iQOO 16 AND Google Pixel 11 Pro
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Vivo iQOO 16’s 6.85 inches screen compared to the Google Pixel 11 Pro’s 6.3 inches display.
Vivo iQOO 16
6.85 inches″
Google Pixel 11 Pro
6.3 inches″
Release Timeline of Vivo iQOO 16 and Google Pixel 11 Pro
Google Pixel 11 Pro was released 1 month, 9 days earlier than Vivo iQOO 16.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Vivo iQOO 16
Google Pixel 11 Pro
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Vivo iQOO 16 is slightly better overall compared to the Google Pixel 11 Pro. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Display and Battery. They are still fairly close in Camera.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.