Tecno Spark Slim VS Infinix GT 30 Pro
We are comparing the Tecno Spark Slim ( Tecno ) head-to-head with the Infinix GT 30 Pro ( Infinix ) . You'll get the key pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Note: This comparison of Tecno Spark Slim vs. Infinix GT 30 Pro is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Tecno Spark Slim AND Infinix GT 30 Pro
Here’s how Tecno Spark Slim and Infinix GT 30 Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which phone excels where.
Reasons to consider the Tecno Spark Slim
-
17% lighter at 156g
Reasons to consider the Infinix GT 30 Pro
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 108 MP
-
7% larger battery (5500 mAh vs 5160 mAh)
-
126% higher AnTuTu v11 score (1420581 vs 628024)
-
75% higher single-core Geekbench score (1295 vs 738)
-
50% more RAM (12GB vs 8GB)
-
109% higher multi-core Geekbench score (4205 vs 2011)
-
100% more storage (512GB vs 256GB)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Tecno Spark Slim AND Infinix GT 30 Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Tecno Spark Slim and Infinix GT 30 Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Tecno Spark Slim | Infinix GT 30 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Tecno | Infinix |
| Release Date: | September 2, 2025 | June 1, 2025 |
| Mobile SoC: | Helio G200 | Dimensity 8350 |
| GPU: | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| Operating System: | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Weight: | 156g | 189g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1224×2720 | 1224×2720 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 440 | 440 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 144 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | 1600 nits | 1600 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Single Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED Flash | 108 MP Main Camera, LED Flash, HDR |
| Main Camera Video: | 1080p at 30/60fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 1080p at 30fps | 4K at 30fps, 1080p at 30fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Sensor | — | Samsung ISOCELL HMX |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/1.33" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | — | 8 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | — | GalaxyCore GC08A8 |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | — | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | GalaxyCore GC13A0 |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/3.1" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5160 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 25 | 24 |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 45W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB | 12 GB, 8 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB | 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 738 | 1295 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 2011 | 4205 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 628024 | 1420581 |
| CPU | 240136 | 175135 |
| GPU | 53265 | 496893 |
| MEM | 152235 | 357523 |
| UX | 182388 | 391030 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 591552 | 1447730 |
| CPU | 220476 | 297323 |
| GPU | 48665 | 550005 |
| MEM | 149900 | 330719 |
| UX | 172511 | 269683 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 4G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano Sim | Dual Sim |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | — | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Tecno Spark Slim AND Infinix GT 30 Pro
The charts below visualize how Tecno Spark Slim and Infinix GT 30 Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Tecno Spark Slim AND Infinix GT 30 Pro
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Tecno Spark Slim’s 6.78 inches screen compared to the Infinix GT 30 Pro’s 6.78 inches display. Each rectangle is scaled so you can see at a glance which phone offers a larger viewing area.
Tecno Spark Slim
6.78 inches″
Infinix GT 30 Pro
6.78 inches″
Release Timeline of Tecno Spark Slim and Infinix GT 30 Pro
Infinix GT 30 Pro was released 3 months, 1 day earlier than Tecno Spark Slim.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Tecno Spark Slim
Infinix GT 30 Pro
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Infinix GT 30 Pro edges out overall compared to the Tecno Spark Slim. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Camera. They are still fairly close in Display and Battery.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.