Tecno Camon 50 Ultra VS Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
We are comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (Tecno) with the Samsung Galaxy A57 5G (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Tecno Camon 50 Ultra AND Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
Here’s how Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A57 5G stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
23% larger battery (6150 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
Higher resolution (1208 x 2644)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
100% more storage (256GB vs 128GB)
-
99% brighter (2386 nits vs 1200 nits)
-
Phone unlock via face
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
-
Superior display technology (Super AMOLED)
-
35% higher AnTuTu v11 score (1390055 vs 1030590)
-
34% higher single-core Geekbench score (1389 vs 1035)
-
49% higher multi-core Geekbench score (4453 vs 2980)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Tecno Camon 50 Ultra AND Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A57 5G.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A57 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Tecno | Samsung |
| Release Date: | March 1, 2026 | March 25, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 7400 | Exynos 1680 |
| GPU: | Arm Mali-G615 MC2 | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 178 g | 179 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.78 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1208 x 2644 | 1080 x 2340 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 429 | 385 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 144 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 2386 nits | 1200 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP + 50 MP + 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Dual LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode, 3x optical zoom | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 720p at 240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps | 4K at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | — |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-700C | Sony IMX906 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | — |
| Focal Length | 70 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.88" | — |
| Pixel Size | 0.61 micron | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 14 mm | — |
| Sensor | — | Sony IMX258 |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | 1/3.06" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6144 | — |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | — |
| Sensor | CMOS | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/3.2" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6150 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 27 | 25 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 45W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | 146 | — |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1035 | 1389 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 2980 | 4453 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1030590 | 1390055 |
| CPU | 358638 | 510705 |
| GPU | 162385 | 374535 |
| MEM | 185392 | 204469 |
| UX | 283981 | 300346 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 922227 | — |
| CPU | 329972 | — |
| GPU | 147724 | — |
| MEM | 155228 | — |
| UX | 289303 | — |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Tecno Camon 50 Ultra AND Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
The charts below visualize how Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A57 5G stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Tecno Camon 50 Ultra AND Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra’s 6.78 inches screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy A57 5G’s 6.7 inches display.
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
6.78 inches″
Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
6.7 inches″
Release Timeline of Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was released 24 days earlier than Samsung Galaxy A57 5G.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, this is a close match and neither phone clearly wins overall. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is stronger in Battery. Samsung Galaxy A57 5G is stronger in Performance. They are about even in Camera and Display. Pick based on what you value most day to day.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.