Tecno Camon 50 Ultra VS Nothing Phone 4a Pro
We are comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (Tecno) with the Nothing Phone 4a Pro (Nothing). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Tecno Camon 50 Ultra AND Nothing Phone 4a Pro
Here’s how Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Nothing Phone 4a Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
-
21% larger battery (6150 mAh vs 5080 mAh)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30 fps
-
49% brighter (2386 nits vs 1600 nits)
-
Phone unlock via face
-
15% lighter at 178g
Reasons to consider the Nothing Phone 4a Pro
-
41% higher AnTuTu v11 score (1452717 vs 1030590)
-
33% higher single-core Geekbench score (1373 vs 1035)
-
50% more RAM (12GB vs 8GB)
-
Higher resolution (1260 x 2800)
-
42% higher multi-core Geekbench score (4243 vs 2980)
-
11% faster charging (50 W vs 45 W)
-
1% larger display (6.83 inches vs 6.78 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Tecno Camon 50 Ultra AND Nothing Phone 4a Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Nothing Phone 4a Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Nothing Phone 4a Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Tecno | Nothing |
| Release Date: | March 1, 2026 | March 5, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 7400 | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| GPU: | Arm Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 722 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 178 g | 210 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.78 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1208 x 2644 | 1260 x 2800 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 429 | 450 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 144 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | 2386 nits | 1600 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP + 50 MP + 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Dual LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode, 3x optical zoom | LED flash, panorama, Ultra XDR |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120 fps, 720p at 240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps | 1080p at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-700C | Sony LYT-710 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.9 |
| Focal Length | 70 mm | 80 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.88" | 1/2.75" |
| Pixel Size | 0.61 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | — | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 14 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | — | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6144 | — |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | ISOCELL CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/3.42" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6150 mAh | 5080 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 27 | 28 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 50 W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB | 12 GB, 8 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB | 256 GB, 128 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | 146 | — |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1035 | 1373 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 2980 | 4243 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1030590 | 1452717 |
| CPU | 358638 | 596701 |
| GPU | 162385 | 329577 |
| MEM | 185392 | 196922 |
| UX | 283981 | 329517 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 922227 | 1077092 |
| CPU | 329972 | 306232 |
| GPU | 147724 | 327665 |
| MEM | 155228 | 213580 |
| UX | 289303 | 229615 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Tecno Camon 50 Ultra AND Nothing Phone 4a Pro
The charts below visualize how Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Nothing Phone 4a Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Tecno Camon 50 Ultra AND Nothing Phone 4a Pro
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra’s 6.78 inches screen compared to the Nothing Phone 4a Pro’s 6.83 inches display.
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
6.78 inches″
Nothing Phone 4a Pro
6.83 inches″
Release Timeline of Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Nothing Phone 4a Pro
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was released 4 days earlier than Nothing Phone 4a Pro.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Nothing Phone 4a Pro
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, this is a close match and neither phone clearly wins overall. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is stronger in Battery. Nothing Phone 4a Pro is stronger in Performance. They are about even in Camera and Display. Pick based on what you value most day to day.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.