Tecno Camon 50 Ultra VS Honor 600
We are comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (Tecno) with the Honor 600 (Honor). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Tecno Camon 50 Ultra AND Honor 600
Here’s how Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Honor 600 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
Phone unlock via face
-
3% larger display (6.78 inches vs 6.57 inches)
Reasons to consider the Honor 600
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
14% larger battery (7000 mAh vs 6150 mAh)
-
22% higher AnTuTu v11 score (1261959 vs 1030590)
-
20% higher single-core Geekbench score (1244 vs 1035)
-
Higher resolution (1264 x 2728)
-
18% higher multi-core Geekbench score (3506 vs 2980)
-
78% faster charging (80 W vs 45 W)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Tecno Camon 50 Ultra AND Honor 600
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Honor 600.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | Honor 600 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Tecno | Honor |
| Release Date: | March 1, 2026 | April 22, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 7400 | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| GPU: | Arm Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 722 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 178 g | — |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.78 inches | 6.57 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1208 x 2644 | 1264 x 2728 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 429 | 458 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 144 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 2386 nits | — |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP + 50 MP + 8 MP | 200 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Dual LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode, 3x optical zoom | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6144 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | — |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-700C | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.4" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | — |
| Focal Length | 70 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.88" | — |
| Pixel Size | 0.61 micron | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 14 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | — |
| Autofocus | — | AF |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6144 | — |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | — |
| Sensor | CMOS | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6150 mAh | 7000 mAh or 6400 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 27 | — |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 80W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB | 256 GB, 128 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | 146 | — |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1035 | 1244 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 2980 | 3506 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1030590 | 1261959 |
| CPU | 358638 | 474975 |
| GPU | 162385 | 266648 |
| MEM | 185392 | 175289 |
| UX | 283981 | 345047 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 922227 | 1077092 |
| CPU | 329972 | 306232 |
| GPU | 147724 | 327665 |
| MEM | 155228 | 213580 |
| UX | 289303 | 229615 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Tecno Camon 50 Ultra AND Honor 600
The charts below visualize how Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Honor 600 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Tecno Camon 50 Ultra AND Honor 600
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra’s 6.78 inches screen compared to the Honor 600’s 6.57 inches display.
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
6.78 inches″
Honor 600
6.57 inches″
Release Timeline of Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and Honor 600
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was released 1 month, 21 days earlier than Honor 600.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Honor 600
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Honor 600 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Battery. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is the better fit if your top priority is Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.