Sharp Aquos R11 VS Samsung Galaxy S26
We are comparing the Sharp Aquos R11 (Sharp) with the Samsung Galaxy S26 (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Sharp Aquos R11 AND Samsung Galaxy S26
Here’s how Sharp Aquos R11 and Samsung Galaxy S26 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Sharp Aquos R11
-
100% smoother display (240 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 50.3 MP + 38.5 MP + 50.3 MP
-
19% larger battery (5100 mAh vs 4300 mAh)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50.3 MP
-
44% faster charging (36 W vs 25 W)
-
38% brighter (3600 nits vs 2600 nits)
-
Phone unlock via face
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S26
-
Superior display technology (Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X)
-
42% higher AnTuTu v11 score (2993684 vs 2112953)
-
79% higher single-core Geekbench score (3378 vs 1884)
-
107% higher multi-core Geekbench score (11097 vs 5367)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30fps
-
14% lighter at 167g
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Sharp Aquos R11 AND Samsung Galaxy S26
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Sharp Aquos R11 and Samsung Galaxy S26.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R11 | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Sharp | Samsung |
| Release Date: | July 9, 2026 | March 6, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | Adreno 825 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 195 g | 167 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 2340 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 396 | 409 |
| Display Technology: | Pro IGZO LTPO OLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 240 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | 2600 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50.3 MP + 38.5 MP + 50.3 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR | Best Face, Horizon Lock, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama, Pro mode, RAW support, Super Steady video |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 8K at 24/30fps, 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50.3 MP | 12 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50.3 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 50.3 MP | 8160 x 6120 |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS BSI | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.0 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 38.5 MP | 10 MP |
| Image Resolution | 38.5 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 68 mm | 67 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung ISOCELL S5K3K1 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.88" | 1/3.94" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.0 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50.3 MP | 12 MP |
| Image Resolution | 50.3 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 13 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | — | Sony IMX564 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.55" | 1/2.55" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.4 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50.3 MP | 12 MP |
| Image Resolution | 50.3 MP | 4000 x 3000 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS BSI | Samsung S5K3LU |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.88" | 1/3.2" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5100 mAh | 4300 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 18 | 30 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 36W | 25W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage: | 512 GB, 256 GB | 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1884 | 3378 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 5367 | 11097 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 2112953 | 2993684 |
| CPU | 485270 | 984024 |
| GPU | 895345 | 1140841 |
| MEM | 390105 | 413795 |
| UX | 342233 | 455024 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2054869 | 3586464 |
| CPU | 402568 | 1039672 |
| GPU | 768857 | 1390228 |
| MEM | 375843 | 419821 |
| UX | 507601 | 736743 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Under display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Sharp Aquos R11 AND Samsung Galaxy S26
The charts below visualize how Sharp Aquos R11 and Samsung Galaxy S26 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Sharp Aquos R11 AND Samsung Galaxy S26
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Sharp Aquos R11’s 6.5 inches screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy S26’s 6.3 inches display.
Sharp Aquos R11
6.5 inches″
Samsung Galaxy S26
6.3 inches″
Release Timeline of Sharp Aquos R11 and Samsung Galaxy S26
Samsung Galaxy S26 was released 4 months, 3 days earlier than Sharp Aquos R11.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Sharp Aquos R11
Samsung Galaxy S26
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy S26 edges out overall compared to the Sharp Aquos R11. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Camera and Battery. The Sharp Aquos R11 is the better fit if your top priority is Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.