Sharp Aquos R11 VS iPhone 17
We are comparing the Sharp Aquos R11 (Sharp) with the iPhone 17 (Apple). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Sharp Aquos R11 AND iPhone 17
Here’s how Sharp Aquos R11 and iPhone 17 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Sharp Aquos R11
-
100% smoother display (240 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 50.3 MP + 38.5 MP + 50.3 MP
-
38% larger battery (5100 mAh vs 3692 mAh)
-
50% more RAM (12GB vs 8GB)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50.3 MP
-
125% brighter (3600 nits vs 1600 nits)
-
3% larger display (6.5 inches vs 6.3 inches)
Reasons to consider the iPhone 17
-
Superior display technology (LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED)
-
11% higher AnTuTu v11 score (2343673 vs 2112953)
-
98% higher single-core Geekbench score (3730 vs 1884)
-
Higher resolution (1206×2622)
-
75% higher multi-core Geekbench score (9382 vs 5367)
-
11% faster charging (40 W vs 36 W)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Sharp Aquos R11 AND iPhone 17
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Sharp Aquos R11 and iPhone 17.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R11 | iPhone 17 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Sharp | Apple |
| Release Date: | July 9, 2026 | October 19, 2025 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | A19 |
| GPU: | Adreno 825 | Apple A19 GPU |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | iOS 26 |
| Weight: | 195 g | 177g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1080 x 2340 | 1206×2622 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 396 | 458 |
| Display Technology: | Pro IGZO LTPO OLED | LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 240 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | 1600 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50.3 MP + 38.5 MP + 50.3 MP | 48 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR | Dual Camera, Photonic Engine, Deep Fusion |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50.3 MP | 18 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50.3 MP | 48 MP |
| Image Resolution | 50.3 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS BSI | Sony IMX904 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 38.5 MP | — |
| Image Resolution | 38.5 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | — |
| Focal Length | 68 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.88" | — |
| Autofocus | PDAF | — |
| Stabilization | Optical | — |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50.3 MP | 48 MP |
| Image Resolution | 50.3 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 13 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | — | Sony IMX972 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.55" | 1/2.55" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50.3 MP | 18 MP |
| Image Resolution | 50.3 MP | 4896 x 3672 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.9 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS BSI | Sony IMX914 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.88" | — |
| Pixel Size | — | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5100 mAh | 3692 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 18 | 30 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 36W | 40W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage: | 512 GB, 256 GB | 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1884 | 3730 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 5367 | 9382 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 2112953 | 2343673 |
| CPU | 485270 | 716645 |
| GPU | 895345 | 819248 |
| MEM | 390105 | 197559 |
| UX | 342233 | 610221 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2054869 | 2300150 |
| CPU | 402568 | 796193 |
| GPU | 768857 | 904328 |
| MEM | 375843 | 219323 |
| UX | 507601 | 380306 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Sim |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | — |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | — |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Sharp Aquos R11 AND iPhone 17
The charts below visualize how Sharp Aquos R11 and iPhone 17 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Sharp Aquos R11 AND iPhone 17
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Sharp Aquos R11’s 6.5 inches screen compared to the iPhone 17’s 6.3 inches display.
Sharp Aquos R11
6.5 inches″
iPhone 17
6.3 inches″
Release Timeline of Sharp Aquos R11 and iPhone 17
iPhone 17 was released 8 months, 20 days earlier than Sharp Aquos R11.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Sharp Aquos R11
iPhone 17
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the iPhone 17 edges out overall compared to the Sharp Aquos R11. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Camera and Battery. The Sharp Aquos R11 is the better fit if your top priority is Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.