Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 VS Apple iPhone Duo
We are comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 (Samsung) with the Apple iPhone Duo (Apple). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 AND Apple iPhone Duo
Here’s how Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Apple iPhone Duo stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
-
10% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3382020 vs 3061434)
-
33% more RAM (16GB vs 12GB)
-
Phone unlock via face
-
21% lighter at 201g
Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone Duo
-
13% larger battery (5400 mAh vs 4800 mAh)
-
16% higher single-core Geekbench score (4231 vs 3645)
-
Higher resolution (1878 x 2670)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 12 MP
-
19% higher multi-core Geekbench score (13202 vs 11102)
-
100% more storage (2 TB vs 1 TB)
-
33% faster charging (60 W vs 45 W)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 AND Apple iPhone Duo
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Apple iPhone Duo.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 | Apple iPhone Duo |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Samsung | Apple |
| Release Date: | August 7, 2026 | October 23, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | A20 Pro |
| GPU: | Adreno 840 | Apple A20 Pro GPU |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | iOS 27 |
| Weight: | 201 g | 254 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 7.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1848 x 2448 pixels | 1878 x 2670 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 403 | 430 |
| Display Technology: | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | Foldable OLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | — | 1000 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP + 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, HDR, panorama | True Tone flash, Photonic Engine, Deep Fusion, Smart HDR 5, Night mode, Smart Take, Duo Preview, macro photography |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps | 4K at 24/25/30/60/100/120 fps, 1080p at 25/30/60/120/240 fps, 720p at 30 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 10 MP + 10 MP | 12 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 24/25/30/60 fps, 1080p at 25/30/60/120 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8064 x 6048 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.28" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel Phase Autofocus | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | — | 13 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.51" | 1/2.55" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 12 MP |
| Image Resolution | 3648 x 2736 | — |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | — |
| Sensor | Sony IMX374 | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.52" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | — |
| Autofocus | No | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 4800 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 26 | 24 |
| Battery Type: | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 60W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 2 TB, 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3645 | 4231 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 11102 | 13202 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3382020 | 3061434 |
| CPU | 992447 | 904154 |
| GPU | 1292614 | 1139824 |
| MEM | 372424 | 259571 |
| UX | 724535 | 757885 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2197874 | — |
| CPU | 1177510 | — |
| GPU | 1402206 | — |
| MEM | 501463 | — |
| UX | 922928 | — |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + Dual eSIM | Dual eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Side Mounted |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 AND Apple iPhone Duo
The charts below visualize how Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Apple iPhone Duo stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 AND Apple iPhone Duo
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8’s 7.6 inches screen compared to the Apple iPhone Duo’s 7.6 inches display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
7.6 inches″
Apple iPhone Duo
7.6 inches″
Release Timeline of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Apple iPhone Duo
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 was released 2 months, 16 days earlier than Apple iPhone Duo.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Apple iPhone Duo
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Apple iPhone Duo has a narrow overall lead compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8. Its strongest advantages are in Camera. They are still fairly close in Performance, Display and Battery.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.