Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra VS Oppo Find N6
We are comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra (Samsung) with the Oppo Find N6 (Oppo). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra AND Oppo Find N6
Here’s how Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Oppo Find N6 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra
-
Superior display technology (Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X)
-
9% higher single-core Geekbench score (3681 vs 3367)
-
Higher resolution (2256 x 2504 pixels)
-
28% higher multi-core Geekbench score (10934 vs 8573)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps
-
Phone unlock via face
-
4% lighter at 215g
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find N6
-
20% larger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
10% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3809818 vs 3453998)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 20 MP
-
78% faster charging (80 W vs 45 W)
-
1% larger display (8.12 inches vs 8 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra AND Oppo Find N6
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Oppo Find N6.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra | Oppo Find N6 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Samsung | Oppo |
| Release Date: | August 7, 2026 | March 20, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 215 g | 225 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 8 inches | 8.12 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 2256 x 2504 pixels | 2248x2480 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 422 | 412 |
| Display Technology: | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | Foldable LTPO OLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | — | 2500 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 200 MP + 10 MP + 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps | 4K at 30/60/120fps (Dolby Vision), 1080p at 30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie Camera: | 10 MP + 10 MP | 20 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30fps, 1080p at 30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Image Resolution | 16320 x 12240 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP2 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 0.6 micron | 0.5 micron |
| Autofocus | Multi-Directional Phase Autofocus | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | OIS |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.7 |
| Focal Length | 67 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3K1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.94" | 1/2.75" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | OIS |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | — | 15 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.75" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Multi-Directional Phase Autofocus | AF |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 20 MP |
| Image Resolution | 3648 x 2736 | — |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX374 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.52" | 1/3.42" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 13 | — |
| Battery Type: | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 80W wired, 44W UFCS, 55W PPS, 18W PD/QC |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16GB, 12GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1TB, 512GB, 256GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3681 | 3367 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 10934 | 8573 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3453998 | 3809818 |
| CPU | 1070366 | 928077 |
| GPU | 1285880 | 1178963 |
| MEM | 407835 | 499953 |
| UX | 689917 | 629586 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2160310 | 3262605 |
| CPU | 1177510 | 823441 |
| GPU | 1402206 | 1232154 |
| MEM | 501463 | 392318 |
| UX | 922928 | 814692 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + Dual eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Side-mounted |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | — |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra AND Oppo Find N6
The charts below visualize how Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Oppo Find N6 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra AND Oppo Find N6
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra’s 8 inches screen compared to the Oppo Find N6’s 8.12 inches display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra
8 inches″
Oppo Find N6
8.12 inches″
Release Timeline of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Oppo Find N6
Oppo Find N6 was released 4 months, 18 days earlier than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra
Oppo Find N6
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra has a narrow overall lead compared to the Oppo Find N6. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Camera and Display. The Oppo Find N6 is the better fit if your top priority is Battery.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.