Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra VS Motorola Razr Fold
We are comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra (Samsung) with the Motorola Razr Fold (Motorola). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra AND Motorola Razr Fold
Here’s how Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Motorola Razr Fold stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP + 10 MP + 50 MP
-
14% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3453998 vs 3024369)
-
41% higher single-core Geekbench score (3681 vs 2617)
-
Higher resolution (2256 x 2504 pixels)
-
24% higher multi-core Geekbench score (10934 vs 8819)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps
-
12% lighter at 215g
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr Fold
-
20% larger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 32 MP + 20 MP
-
78% faster charging (80 W vs 45 W)
-
1% larger display (8.1 inches vs 8 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra AND Motorola Razr Fold
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Motorola Razr Fold.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra | Motorola Razr Fold |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Samsung | Motorola |
| Release Date: | August 7, 2026 | April 18, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| GPU: | Adreno 840 | Adreno 830 |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 215 g | 243 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 8 inches | 8.1 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 2256 x 2504 pixels | 2232 x 2484 pixels |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 422 | 410 |
| Display Technology: | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | Foldable LTPO P-OLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 200 MP + 10 MP + 50 MP | 50 MP + 50 MP + 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 10 MP + 10 MP | 32 MP + 20 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 16320 x 12240 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP2 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.28" |
| Pixel Size | 0.6 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Multi-Directional Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 67 mm | 71 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3K1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.94" | 1/1.95" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | — | 12 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Multi-Directional Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 32 MP |
| Image Resolution | 3648 x 2736 | — |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX374 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.52" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 13 | 16 |
| Battery Type: | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 80W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | — | 164 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3681 | 2617 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 10934 | 8819 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3453998 | 3024369 |
| CPU | 1070366 | 1003820 |
| GPU | 1285880 | 1164992 |
| MEM | 407835 | 379415 |
| UX | 689917 | 678500 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2160310 | 2342132 |
| CPU | 1177510 | 624873 |
| GPU | 1402206 | 1217691 |
| MEM | 501463 | 449196 |
| UX | 922928 | 431276 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + Dual eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Side Mounted |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra AND Motorola Razr Fold
The charts below visualize how Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Motorola Razr Fold stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra AND Motorola Razr Fold
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra’s 8 inches screen compared to the Motorola Razr Fold’s 8.1 inches display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra
8 inches″
Motorola Razr Fold
8.1 inches″
Release Timeline of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Motorola Razr Fold
Motorola Razr Fold was released 3 months, 20 days earlier than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra
Motorola Razr Fold
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Motorola Razr Fold has a narrow overall lead compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra. Its strongest advantages are in Camera and Battery. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra is the better fit if your top priority is Performance.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.