Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 VS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
We are comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 (Samsung) with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 AND Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Here’s how Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is the best choice:
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
31% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3065623 vs 2347721)
-
42% higher single-core Geekbench score (3181 vs 2244)
-
33% more RAM (16GB vs 12GB)
-
Higher resolution (1968 x 2184)
-
46% higher multi-core Geekbench score (10029 vs 6876)
-
10% lighter at 215g
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 AND Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Samsung | Samsung |
| Release Date: | July 1, 2024 | July 1, 2025 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| GPU: | Adreno 750 | Adreno 830 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 239 g | 215 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 7.6 inches | 8 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1856 x 2160 | 1968 x 2184 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 374 | 368 |
| Display Technology: | Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 2600 nits (HDR) | 1300 nits, 2600 nits (HDR) |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode, RAW support | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 60 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 720p at 960 fps | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 60 fps, 1080p at 240 fps, 720p at 960 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 10 MP | 10 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 60 fps | 4K at 60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 16320 x 12240 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL GN3 | Samsung ISOCELL HP2 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.3" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 0.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 10 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 66 mm | 67 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL 3K1 | Samsung S5K3K1 |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.94" | 1/3.94" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 13 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL 3LU | Sony IMX564 |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.2" | 1/2.55" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 1.4 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 10 MP |
| Image Resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX374 | Sony IMX374 |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.0" | 1/3.0" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 4400 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 20 | 21 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Charging Speed: | 25W | 25W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | 133 | — |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2244 | 3181 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 6876 | 10029 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 2347721 | 3065623 |
| CPU | 712674 | 939230 |
| GPU | 793489 | 1190171 |
| MEM | 343934 | 376287 |
| UX | 497624 | 559935 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2052015 | 2723036 |
| CPU | 436420 | 624873 |
| GPU | 870679 | 1217691 |
| MEM | 392296 | 449196 |
| UX | 352620 | 431276 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Side Mounted |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 AND Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
The charts below visualize how Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 AND Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6’s 7.6 inches screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7’s 8 inches display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
7.6 inches″
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
8 inches″
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 edges out overall compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Battery. They are still fairly close in Camera and Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.