Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra VS Xiaomi 17 Ultra
We are comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra ( Samsung ) head-to-head with the Xiaomi 17 Ultra ( Xiaomi ) . You'll get the key pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Note: This comparison of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. Xiaomi 17 Ultra is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra AND Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Here’s how Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which phone excels where.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
-
Superior display technology (Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X)
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
Higher resolution (1440 x 3120)
-
2% lighter at 214g
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Ultra
-
20% larger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
6% higher AnTuTu v11 score (4250017 vs 4005831)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
50% faster charging (90 W vs 60 W)
-
35% brighter (3500 nits vs 2600 nits)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra AND Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Release Date: | March 6, 2026 | March 10, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 214 g | 218.4 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1440 x 3120 | 1200 x 2608 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 498 | 416 |
| Display Technology: | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 2600 | 3500 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Quad Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Laser AF, Best Face, Horizon Lock, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, Pro mode, RAW support |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 24/30fps, 4K at 30/60/120fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240fps | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240/480/960/1920 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.7 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP2 | Omnivision Light Fusion 1050L |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.3" | 1/1" |
| Pixel Size | 0.6 micron | 1.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.9 | f/2.4 - 3.0 |
| Focal Length | 111 mm | 75-100 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX854 | Samsung ISOCELL HPE |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.52" | 1/1.4" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | — | Multi-directional PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 13 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN3 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | — | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5K3LU | Omnivision OV50M |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.2" | 1/2.7" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 0.61 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 29 | 31 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 60W | 90W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | 157 | 166 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3753 | 3711 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 11259 | 11259 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 4005831 | 4250017 |
| CPU | 1165757 | 1370257 |
| GPU | 1539732 | 1454536 |
| MEM | 488505 | 538004 |
| UX | 811837 | 887220 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 3720219 | 3963774 |
| CPU | 1094797 | 1198653 |
| GPU | 1447696 | 1458267 |
| MEM | 425113 | 501472 |
| UX | 752613 | 805382 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | — | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | — | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | — | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | — | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra AND Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The charts below visualize how Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra AND Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra’s 6.9 inches screen compared to the Xiaomi 17 Ultra’s 6.9 inches display. Each rectangle is scaled so you can see at a glance which phone offers a larger viewing area.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
6.9 inches″
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
6.9 inches″
Release Timeline of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra was released 4 days earlier than Xiaomi 17 Ultra.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a narrow overall lead compared to the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. Its strongest advantages are in Camera and Battery. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is the better fit if your top priority is Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.