Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra VS Oppo Find X9 Ultra
We are comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Samsung) with the Oppo Find X9 Ultra (Oppo). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra AND Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Here’s how Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Oppo Find X9 Ultra stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
-
Superior display technology (Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X)
-
3% higher single-core Geekbench score (3753 vs 3646)
-
33% more RAM (16GB vs 12GB)
-
300% more storage (1 TB vs 256GB)
-
44% brighter (2600 nits vs 1800 nits)
-
9% lighter at 214g
-
1% larger display (6.9 inches vs 6.82 inches)
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Ultra
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
41% larger battery (7050 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
Higher resolution (1440 x 3168)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
67% faster charging (100 W vs 60 W)
-
8% higher AnTuTu score (4004107 vs 3720219)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra AND Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Oppo Find X9 Ultra.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Oppo Find X9 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Samsung | Oppo |
| Release Date: | March 6, 2026 | May 1, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 214 g | 235 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.9 inches | 6.82 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1440 x 3120 | 1440 x 3168 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 498 | 510 |
| Display Technology: | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | 2600 | 1800 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Quad Camera | Quad Camera |
| Main Camera: | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Laser AF, Best Face, Horizon Lock, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 24/30fps, 4K at 30/60/120fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240fps | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 120 fps, 1080p at 240 fps, 720p slow motion at 480 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 16320 x 12240 |
| Aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.5 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP2 | Sony LYTIA-901 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.12" |
| Pixel Size | 0.6 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.9 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 111 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX854 | OmniVision OV52A |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.52" | 1/1.28" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 0.61 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 13 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN3 | Sony LYTIA-600 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.95" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 8160 x 6128 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5K3LU | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.2" | 1/2.75" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5000 mAh | 7050 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 29 | 37 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Ion | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Charging Speed: | 60W | 100W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | 157 | — |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3753 | 3646 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 11259 | 11276 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 4005831 | 4086107 |
| CPU | 1165757 | 1166693 |
| GPU | 1539732 | 1523262 |
| MEM | 488505 | 509363 |
| UX | 811837 | 886789 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 3720219 | 4004107 |
| CPU | 1094797 | 1177510 |
| GPU | 1447696 | 1402206 |
| MEM | 425113 | 501463 |
| UX | 752613 | 922928 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | — | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | — | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | — | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | — | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra AND Oppo Find X9 Ultra
The charts below visualize how Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Oppo Find X9 Ultra stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra AND Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra’s 6.9 inches screen compared to the Oppo Find X9 Ultra’s 6.82 inches display.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
6.9 inches″
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
6.82 inches″
Release Timeline of Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra was released 1 month, 25 days earlier than Oppo Find X9 Ultra.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Oppo Find X9 Ultra has a narrow overall lead compared to the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. Its strongest advantages are in Camera and Battery. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is the better fit if your top priority is Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.