Samsung Galaxy A57 5G VS Nothing Phone 4a Pro
We are comparing the Samsung Galaxy A57 5G (Samsung) with the Nothing Phone 4a Pro (Nothing). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Samsung Galaxy A57 5G AND Nothing Phone 4a Pro
Here’s how Samsung Galaxy A57 5G and Nothing Phone 4a Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
-
Superior display technology (Super AMOLED)
-
5% higher multi-core Geekbench score (4453 vs 4243)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30 fps
-
15% lighter at 179g
Reasons to consider the Nothing Phone 4a Pro
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
2% larger battery (5080 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
5% higher AnTuTu v11 score (1452717 vs 1390055)
-
50% more RAM (12GB vs 8GB)
-
Higher resolution (1260 x 2800)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 32 MP
-
100% more storage (256GB vs 128GB)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A57 5G AND Nothing Phone 4a Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Samsung Galaxy A57 5G and Nothing Phone 4a Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A57 5G | Nothing Phone 4a Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Samsung | Nothing |
| Release Date: | March 25, 2026 | March 5, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Exynos 1680 | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| GPU: | Samsung Xclipse 550 | Adreno 722 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 179 g | 210 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.7 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1080 x 2340 | 1260 x 2800 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 385 | 450 |
| Display Technology: | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | 1200 nits | 1600 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | LED flash, panorama, Ultra XDR |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 720p at 240 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120 fps, 720p at 240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps | 1080p at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal Length | — | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX906 | Sony LYT-710 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | — | 50 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.9 |
| Focal Length | — | 80 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/2.75" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | — | PDAF |
| Stabilization | — | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | — | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX258 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.06" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | — | 22 mm |
| Sensor | — | ISOCELL CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.2" | 1/3.42" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5000 mAh | 5080 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 25 | 28 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 50 W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB | 12 GB, 8 GB |
| Storage: | 128 GB | 256 GB, 128 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1389 | 1373 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 4453 | 4243 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1390055 | 1452717 |
| CPU | 510705 | 596701 |
| GPU | 374535 | 329577 |
| MEM | 204469 | 196922 |
| UX | 300346 | 329517 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | — | 1077092 |
| CPU | — | 306232 |
| GPU | — | 327665 |
| MEM | — | 213580 |
| UX | — | 229615 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A57 5G AND Nothing Phone 4a Pro
The charts below visualize how Samsung Galaxy A57 5G and Nothing Phone 4a Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A57 5G AND Nothing Phone 4a Pro
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Samsung Galaxy A57 5G’s 6.7 inches screen compared to the Nothing Phone 4a Pro’s 6.83 inches display.
Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
6.7 inches″
Nothing Phone 4a Pro
6.83 inches″
Release Timeline of Samsung Galaxy A57 5G and Nothing Phone 4a Pro
Nothing Phone 4a Pro was released 20 days earlier than Samsung Galaxy A57 5G.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
Nothing Phone 4a Pro
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy A57 5G has a narrow overall lead compared to the Nothing Phone 4a Pro. Its strongest advantages are in Camera and Display. They are still fairly close in Performance and Battery.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.