Samsung Galaxy A37 5G VS Vivo V70 FE
We are comparing the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G (Samsung) with the Vivo V70 FE (Vivo). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Samsung Galaxy A37 5G AND Vivo V70 FE
Here’s how Samsung Galaxy A37 5G and Vivo V70 FE stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
-
Superior display technology (Super AMOLED)
-
12% higher single-core Geekbench score (1153 vs 1025)
-
20% higher multi-core Geekbench score (3457 vs 2882)
-
Supports NFC
-
2% lighter at 196g
Reasons to consider the Vivo V70 FE
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP + 8 MP
-
40% larger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
29% higher AnTuTu v11 score (1183301 vs 917489)
-
100% more RAM (12GB vs 6GB)
-
Higher resolution (1260 x 2800 pixels)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 32 MP
-
100% more storage (256GB vs 128GB)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A37 5G AND Vivo V70 FE
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Samsung Galaxy A37 5G and Vivo V70 FE.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | Vivo V70 FE |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Samsung | Vivo |
| Release Date: | March 25, 2026 | March 9, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Exynos 1480 | Dimensity 7360 |
| GPU: | Samsung Xclipse 530 | Arm Mali-G615 MC2 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 196 g | 200 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.7 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1080 x 2340 | 1260 x 2800 pixels |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 385 | 449 |
| Display Technology: | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 1898 nits | 1900 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 200 MP + 8 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | Quad LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 720p at 240 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.88 |
| Focal Length | — | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX906 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | — |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | 1/4.0" |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | — | 22 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.2" | 1/3.1" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | — |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 23 | 38 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Ion | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 90W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 6 GB | 12 GB, 8 GB |
| Storage: | 128 GB | 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1153 | 1025 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3457 | 2882 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 917489 | 1183301 |
| CPU | 356292 | 516540 |
| GPU | 154325 | 107501 |
| MEM | 146189 | 203749 |
| UX | 260683 | 355511 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 720015 | 916820 |
| CPU | 232912 | 336816 |
| GPU | 169273 | 121302 |
| MEM | 148113 | 195338 |
| UX | 169717 | 263364 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A37 5G AND Vivo V70 FE
The charts below visualize how Samsung Galaxy A37 5G and Vivo V70 FE stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A37 5G AND Vivo V70 FE
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G’s 6.7 inches screen compared to the Vivo V70 FE’s 6.83 inches display.
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
6.7 inches″
Vivo V70 FE
6.83 inches″
Release Timeline of Samsung Galaxy A37 5G and Vivo V70 FE
Vivo V70 FE was released 16 days earlier than Samsung Galaxy A37 5G.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Vivo V70 FE
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Vivo V70 FE has a narrow overall lead compared to the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Battery. The Samsung Galaxy A37 5G is the better fit if your top priority is Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.