Samsung Galaxy A37 5G VS Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G
We are comparing the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G (Samsung) with the Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G (Honor). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Samsung Galaxy A37 5G AND Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G
Here’s how Samsung Galaxy A37 5G and Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
-
Superior display technology (Super AMOLED)
-
6% higher single-core Geekbench score (1153 vs 1092)
-
11% higher multi-core Geekbench score (3457 vs 3106)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30 fps
-
Supports NFC
Reasons to consider the Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 108 MP
-
50% larger battery (7500 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
8% higher AnTuTu v11 score (994655 vs 917489)
-
33% more RAM (8GB vs 6GB)
-
Higher resolution (1200 x 2640)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 16 MP
-
100% more storage (256GB vs 128GB)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A37 5G AND Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Samsung Galaxy A37 5G and Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A37 5G | Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Samsung | Honor |
| Release Date: | March 25, 2026 | January 1, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Exynos 1480 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 |
| GPU: | Samsung Xclipse 530 | Adreno 810 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 196 g | 189 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.7 inches | 6.79 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1080 x 2340 | 1200 x 2640 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 385 | 427 |
| Display Technology: | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 1898 nits | 1800 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 720p at 240 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps | 1080p at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 12000 x 9000 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | — | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX906 | Samsung HM6 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.67" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | — | 17 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | 1/5.0" |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 3456 x 4608 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.5 |
| Focal Length | — | 24 mm |
| Sensor | — | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.2" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | — |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5000 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 23 | 32 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Ion | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 66W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage: | 128 GB | 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1153 | 1092 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3457 | 3106 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 917489 | 994655 |
| CPU | 356292 | 367868 |
| GPU | 154325 | 164059 |
| MEM | 146189 | 214576 |
| UX | 260683 | 248152 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 720015 | — |
| CPU | 232912 | — |
| GPU | 169273 | — |
| MEM | 148113 | — |
| UX | 169717 | — |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A37 5G AND Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G
The charts below visualize how Samsung Galaxy A37 5G and Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A37 5G AND Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G’s 6.7 inches screen compared to the Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G’s 6.79 inches display.
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
6.7 inches″
Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G
6.79 inches″
Release Timeline of Samsung Galaxy A37 5G and Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G
Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G was released 2 months, 24 days earlier than Samsung Galaxy A37 5G.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G has a narrow overall lead compared to the Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G. Its strongest advantages are in Camera and Display. The Honor Magic 8 Lite 5G is the better fit if your top priority is Battery.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.