Samsung Galaxy A35 5G VS Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
We are comparing the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G ( Samsung ) head-to-head with the Samsung Galaxy F36 5G ( Samsung ) . You'll get the key pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Note: This comparison of Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy F36 5G is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Samsung Galaxy A35 5G AND Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
Here’s how Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and Samsung Galaxy F36 5G stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which phone excels where.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
-
45% higher multi-core Geekbench score (2855 vs 1970)
-
Water resistant
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
-
6% lighter at 197g
-
2% larger display (6.7 inches vs 6.6 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A35 5G AND Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and Samsung Galaxy F36 5G.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Samsung | Samsung |
| Release Date: | March 1, 2024 | July 29, 2025 |
| Mobile SoC: | Exynos 1380 | Exynos 1380 |
| GPU: | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 209 g | 197 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1080 x 2340 | 1080 x 2340 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 390 | 387 |
| Display Technology: | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 1000 nits | 1000 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | LED flash, panorama, HDR, OIS, gyro-EIS |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 720p at 240 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps, 720p at 480 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN8 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.96" |
| Pixel Size | 0.8 micron | — |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A3 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Image Resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5K3L6 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.06" | 1/3.06" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 22 | — |
| Battery Type: | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 25W | 25W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB, 6 GB | 8 GB, 6 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB, 128 GB | 256 GB, 128 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | 104 | — |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1006 | 1008 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 2855 | 1970 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 768212 | 772609 |
| CPU | 311721 | 329197 |
| GPU | 89942 | 90172 |
| MEM | 136276 | 123650 |
| UX | 230273 | 229590 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | — | 578500 |
| CPU | — | 229431 |
| GPU | — | 68141 |
| MEM | — | 113553 |
| UX | — | 167375 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Side Mounted |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A35 5G AND Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
The charts below visualize how Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and Samsung Galaxy F36 5G stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A35 5G AND Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G’s 6.6 inches screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy F36 5G’s 6.7 inches display. Each rectangle is scaled so you can see at a glance which phone offers a larger viewing area.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
6.6 inches″
Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
6.7 inches″
Release Timeline of Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G was released 1 year, 4 months, 28 days earlier than Samsung Galaxy F36 5G.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy F36 5G has a narrow overall lead compared to the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Its strongest advantages are in Camera and Battery. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is the better fit if your top priority is Performance.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.