Samsung Galaxy A27 5G VS Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
We are comparing the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (Samsung) with the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (Tecno). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Samsung Galaxy A27 5G AND Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Here’s how Samsung Galaxy A27 5G and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
-
Superior display technology (Super AMOLED)
-
microSD support
Reasons to consider the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
23% larger battery (6150 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
21% higher AnTuTu v11 score (1030590 vs 849080)
-
3% higher single-core Geekbench score (1035 vs 1002)
-
Higher resolution (1208 x 2644)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
80% faster charging (45 W vs 25 W)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A27 5G AND Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Samsung Galaxy A27 5G and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A27 5G | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Samsung | Tecno |
| Release Date: | July 3, 2026 | March 1, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Dimensity 7400 |
| GPU: | Adreno 710 | Arm Mali-G615 MC2 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 200 g | 178 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.7 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 1208 x 2644 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 385 | 429 |
| Display Technology: | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | 1400 nits | 2386 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP + 5 MP + 2 MP | 50 MP + 50 MP + 8 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | Dual LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode, 3x optical zoom |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 1080p at 30 fps | 4K at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8160 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1 | Sony LYT-700C |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | — | 50 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | — | 70 mm |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/2.88" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.61 micron |
| Stabilization | — | Digital |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | — | 14 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/5" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 8160 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | — | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5000 mAh | 6150 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 23 | 27 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Charging Speed: | 25W | 45W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB, 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB, 128 GB | 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | — | 146 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1002 | 1035 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 2993 | 2980 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 849080 | 1030590 |
| CPU | 316968 | 358638 |
| GPU | 103093 | 162385 |
| MEM | 179729 | 185392 |
| UX | 249290 | 283981 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 210120 | 922227 |
| CPU | 210120 | 329972 |
| GPU | — | 147724 |
| MEM | — | 155228 |
| UX | — | 289303 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Mono Speaker | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A27 5G AND Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
The charts below visualize how Samsung Galaxy A27 5G and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Samsung Galaxy A27 5G AND Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G’s 6.7 inches screen compared to the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra’s 6.78 inches display.
Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
6.7 inches″
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
6.78 inches″
Release Timeline of Samsung Galaxy A27 5G and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was released 4 months, 2 days earlier than Samsung Galaxy A27 5G.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has a narrow overall lead compared to the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Camera and Battery. The Samsung Galaxy A27 5G is the better fit if your top priority is Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.