Realme 14T 5G VS Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
We are comparing the Realme 14T 5G ( Realme ) head-to-head with the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G ( Samsung ) . You'll get the key pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Note: This comparison of Realme 14T 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Realme 14T 5G AND Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Here’s how Realme 14T 5G and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which phone excels where.
Reasons to consider the Realme 14T 5G
-
33% smoother display (120 Hz vs 90 Hz)
-
20% larger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
Higher resolution (1080 x 2400)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 16 MP
-
80% faster charging (45 W vs 25 W)
-
163% brighter (2100 nits vs 800 nits)
-
2% lighter at 196g
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
-
Superior display technology (Super AMOLED)
-
29% higher single-core Geekbench score (992 vs 771)
-
11% higher multi-core Geekbench score (2197 vs 1980)
-
microSD support
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Realme 14T 5G AND Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Realme 14T 5G and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Realme 14T 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Realme | Samsung |
| Release Date: | April 29, 2025 | October 1, 2024 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 6300 | Dimensity 6300 |
| GPU: | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Operating System: | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 196 g | 200 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.67 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1080 x 2400 | 1080 x 2340 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 386 | 385 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 90 |
| Display Brightness: | 2100 nits | 800 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Dual Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 1080p at 60 fps, 720p at 120 fps | 1080p at 30 fps, 720p at 120 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 1080p at 30 fps | 1080p at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8160 x 6120 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 27 mm | — |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50D40 Light Hunter 400 | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.88" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.61 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | — | 5 MP |
| Aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | — | SmartSens SC501 |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/5.0" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | — | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| Image Resolution | 4920 x 3264 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX480 | GalaxyCore GC13A0 |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.09" | 1/3.1" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 24 | 20 |
| Battery Type: | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 25W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB | 8 GB, 6 GB, 4 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB, 128 GB | 256 GB, 128 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | — | 77 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 771 | 992 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 1980 | 2197 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 569901 | 576249 |
| CPU | 219522 | 244407 |
| GPU | 47895 | 42598 |
| MEM | 137798 | 110301 |
| UX | 164686 | 178943 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 415779 | 415779 |
| CPU | 128992 | 128992 |
| GPU | 43719 | 43719 |
| MEM | 98960 | 98960 |
| UX | 144108 | 144108 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Side Mounted |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Mono Speaker |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Realme 14T 5G AND Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
The charts below visualize how Realme 14T 5G and Samsung Galaxy A16 5G stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Realme 14T 5G AND Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Realme 14T 5G’s 6.67 inches screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G’s 6.7 inches display. Each rectangle is scaled so you can see at a glance which phone offers a larger viewing area.
Realme 14T 5G
6.67 inches″
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
6.7 inches″
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Realme 14T 5G
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, this is a close match and neither phone clearly wins overall. Realme 14T 5G is stronger in Display and Battery. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is stronger in Performance and Camera. They are about even in Connectivity & Features. Pick based on what you value most day to day.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.