Oppo Reno 16 Pro VS Motorola Edge 70 Pro
We are comparing the Oppo Reno 16 Pro (Oppo) with the Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Motorola). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Oppo Reno 16 Pro AND Motorola Edge 70 Pro
Here’s how Oppo Reno 16 Pro and Motorola Edge 70 Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 16 Pro
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
8% larger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500 mAh)
-
40% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3079298 vs 2194258)
-
51% higher single-core Geekbench score (2623 vs 1739)
-
22% higher multi-core Geekbench score (8359 vs 6864)
Reasons to consider the Motorola Edge 70 Pro
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
13% faster charging (90 W vs 80 W)
-
Phone unlock via face
-
11% lighter at 183g
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Oppo Reno 16 Pro AND Motorola Edge 70 Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Oppo Reno 16 Pro and Motorola Edge 70 Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 Pro | Motorola Edge 70 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Oppo | Motorola |
| Release Date: | May 1, 2026 | April 29, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 9500s | Dimensity 8500 |
| GPU: | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Arm Mali-G720 MC8 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 205 g | 183 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.78 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1272 x 2772 | 1272 x 2772 pixels |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 450 | 450 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | 1800 nits | 1800 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 200 MP | 50 MP + 50 MP + 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Dual LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | LED flash, HDR, panorama, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 60 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 1080p slow motion at 240 fps | 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 60 fps | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 16320 x 12240 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | — | Sony LYT-710 |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.5 |
| Focal Length | 80 mm | 81 mm |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | — | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 16 mm | 12 mm |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | — | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.9 |
| Focal Length | 18 mm | — |
| Sensor | — | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 7000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 30 |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Charging Speed: | 80W | 90W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB | 12 GB, 8 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB | 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2623 | 1739 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 8359 | 6864 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3079298 | 2194258 |
| CPU | 856895 | 663520 |
| GPU | 1052004 | 660873 |
| MEM | 449847 | 386978 |
| UX | 720552 | 482887 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 3298445 | — |
| CPU | 952789 | — |
| GPU | 1130421 | — |
| MEM | 502375 | — |
| UX | 712860 | — |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Oppo Reno 16 Pro AND Motorola Edge 70 Pro
The charts below visualize how Oppo Reno 16 Pro and Motorola Edge 70 Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Oppo Reno 16 Pro AND Motorola Edge 70 Pro
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Oppo Reno 16 Pro’s 6.78 inches screen compared to the Motorola Edge 70 Pro’s 6.8 inches display.
Oppo Reno 16 Pro
6.78 inches″
Motorola Edge 70 Pro
6.8 inches″
Release Timeline of Oppo Reno 16 Pro and Motorola Edge 70 Pro
Motorola Edge 70 Pro was released 2 days earlier than Oppo Reno 16 Pro.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Oppo Reno 16 Pro
Motorola Edge 70 Pro
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Oppo Reno 16 Pro has a narrow overall lead compared to the Motorola Edge 70 Pro. Its strongest advantages are in Performance. They are still fairly close in Camera, Display and Battery.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.