Oppo Reno 15 VS Honor 600
We are comparing the Oppo Reno 15 (Oppo) with the Honor 600 (Honor). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Oppo Reno 15 AND Honor 600
Here’s how Oppo Reno 15 and Honor 600 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 15
-
11% higher AnTuTu v11 score (1394716 vs 1261959)
-
50% more RAM (12GB vs 8GB)
-
Higher resolution (1256 x 2760)
-
17% higher multi-core Geekbench score (4106 vs 3506)
-
100% more storage (512GB vs 256GB)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 60 fps
Reasons to consider the Honor 600
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
8% larger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500 mAh)
-
Supports NFC
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Oppo Reno 15 AND Honor 600
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Oppo Reno 15 and Honor 600.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Oppo Reno 15 | Honor 600 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Oppo | Honor |
| Release Date: | January 1, 2026 | April 22, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 | Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| GPU: | Adreno 722 | Adreno 722 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 197 g | — |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.59 inches | 6.57 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1256 x 2760 | 1264 x 2728 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 460 | 458 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 600 nits, 1200 nits (HDR) | — |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 60 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 1080p slow motion at 120 fps | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 60 fps | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 26 mm | — |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.4" |
| Pixel Size | 0.8 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | — |
| Focal Length | 85 mm | — |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | — |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | — |
| Stabilization | Optical | — |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | — |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV08D | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | — |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | AF |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | — |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 18 mm | — |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | — |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh or 6400 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 29 | — |
| Battery Type: | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 80W | 80W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB, 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage: | 512 GB, 256 GB | 256 GB, 128 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1270 | 1244 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 4106 | 3506 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1394716 | 1261959 |
| CPU | 481018 | 474975 |
| GPU | 327987 | 266648 |
| MEM | 249030 | 175289 |
| UX | 336681 | 345047 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1077092 | 1077092 |
| CPU | 306232 | 306232 |
| GPU | 327665 | 327665 |
| MEM | 213580 | 213580 |
| UX | 229615 | 229615 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Oppo Reno 15 AND Honor 600
The charts below visualize how Oppo Reno 15 and Honor 600 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Oppo Reno 15 AND Honor 600
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Oppo Reno 15’s 6.59 inches screen compared to the Honor 600’s 6.57 inches display.
Oppo Reno 15
6.59 inches″
Honor 600
6.57 inches″
Release Timeline of Oppo Reno 15 and Honor 600
Oppo Reno 15 was released 3 months, 21 days earlier than Honor 600.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Oppo Reno 15
Honor 600
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Oppo Reno 15 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Honor 600. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Camera. The Honor 600 is the better fit if your top priority is Battery.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.