Oppo Reno 15 F 5G VS Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
We are comparing the Oppo Reno 15 F 5G (Oppo) with the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Oppo Reno 15 F 5G AND Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Here’s how Oppo Reno 15 F 5G and Samsung Galaxy A37 5G stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 15 F 5G
-
40% larger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
100% more RAM (12GB vs 6GB)
-
Higher resolution (1080 x 2372)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
300% more storage (512GB vs 128GB)
-
78% faster charging (80 W vs 45 W)
-
microSD support
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
-
Superior display technology (Super AMOLED)
-
25% higher AnTuTu v11 score (917489 vs 733620)
-
23% higher single-core Geekbench score (1153 vs 935)
-
27% higher multi-core Geekbench score (3457 vs 2719)
-
216% brighter (1898 nits vs 600 nits)
-
Supports NFC
-
2% larger display (6.7 inches vs 6.57 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Oppo Reno 15 F 5G AND Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Oppo Reno 15 F 5G and Samsung Galaxy A37 5G.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Oppo Reno 15 F 5G | Samsung Galaxy A37 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Oppo | Samsung |
| Release Date: | January 9, 2026 | March 25, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Exynos 1480 |
| GPU: | Adreno 710 | Samsung Xclipse 530 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 195 g | 196 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.57 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1080 x 2372 | 1080 x 2340 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 397 | 385 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 600 nits | 1898 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120 fps, 720p at 30/60/120/240 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 720p at 240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30 fps | 4K at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 26 mm | — |
| Sensor | — | Sony IMX906 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 0.8 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 16 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/4.0" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 18 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/3.2" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 23 |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 80W | 45W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB, 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage: | 512 GB, 256 GB, 128 GB | 128 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 935 | 1153 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 2719 | 3457 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 733620 | 917489 |
| CPU | 303398 | 356292 |
| GPU | 73566 | 154325 |
| MEM | 162587 | 146189 |
| UX | 194069 | 260683 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 186742 | 720015 |
| CPU | 186742 | 232912 |
| GPU | — | 169273 |
| MEM | — | 148113 |
| UX | — | 169717 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Oppo Reno 15 F 5G AND Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
The charts below visualize how Oppo Reno 15 F 5G and Samsung Galaxy A37 5G stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Oppo Reno 15 F 5G AND Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Oppo Reno 15 F 5G’s 6.57 inches screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G’s 6.7 inches display.
Oppo Reno 15 F 5G
6.57 inches″
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
6.7 inches″
Release Timeline of Oppo Reno 15 F 5G and Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Oppo Reno 15 F 5G was released 2 months, 16 days earlier than Samsung Galaxy A37 5G.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Oppo Reno 15 F 5G
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G has a narrow overall lead compared to the Oppo Reno 15 F 5G. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Display. The Oppo Reno 15 F 5G is the better fit if your top priority is Battery.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.