Oppo Find X9 VS Vivo X300
We are comparing the Oppo Find X9 ( Oppo ) head-to-head with the Vivo X300 ( Vivo ) . You'll get the key pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Note: This comparison of Oppo Find X9 vs. Vivo X300 is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Oppo Find X9 AND Vivo X300
Here’s how Oppo Find X9 and Vivo X300 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which phone excels where.
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9
-
16% larger battery (7025 mAh vs 6040 mAh)
-
Higher resolution (1256×2760)
-
259% higher AnTuTu score (12123196 vs 3380237)
-
4% larger display (6.59 inches vs 6.31 inches)
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300
-
Superior display technology (LTPO AMOLED)
-
3% higher single-core Geekbench score (3383 vs 3291)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
5% higher multi-core Geekbench score (10099 vs 9664)
-
13% faster charging (90 W vs 80 W)
-
25% brighter (4500 nits vs 3600 nits)
-
6% lighter at 190g
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Oppo Find X9 AND Vivo X300
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Oppo Find X9 and Vivo X300.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Oppo | Vivo |
| Release Date: | October 16, 2025 | October 13, 2025 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 9500 | Dimensity 9500 |
| GPU: | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 203g | 190g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.59 inches | 6.31 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1256×2760 | 1216×2640 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 460 | 461 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 3600 nits | 4500 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | OIS, Hasselblad tuning, telephoto zoom | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens, HDR |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60/120fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.65 | f/1.68 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-808 | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.4" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | af/2.6 |
| Focal Length | 73 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | Sony LYT-602 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.95" |
| Pixel Size | 0.5 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | — | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | — | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | — | 20 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | — | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 7025 mAh | 6040 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 30 | 27 |
| Battery Type: | Si-C Li-Ion | Si-C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 80W | 90W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3291 | 3383 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 9664 | 10099 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3375202 | 3455738 |
| CPU | 1011522 | 991635 |
| GPU | 1260602 | 1343858 |
| MEM | 370683 | 348931 |
| UX | 732395 | 771314 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 12123196 | 3380237 |
| CPU | 9758847 | 979188 |
| GPU | 1334740 | 1334640 |
| MEM | 388222 | 354261 |
| UX | 641387 | 712148 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Sim | Dual Sim |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Oppo Find X9 AND Vivo X300
The charts below visualize how Oppo Find X9 and Vivo X300 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Oppo Find X9 AND Vivo X300
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Oppo Find X9’s 6.59 inches screen compared to the Vivo X300’s 6.31 inches display. Each rectangle is scaled so you can see at a glance which phone offers a larger viewing area.
Oppo Find X9
6.59 inches″
Vivo X300
6.31 inches″
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Oppo Find X9
Vivo X300
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Oppo Find X9 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Vivo X300. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Battery. The Vivo X300 is the better fit if your top priority is Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.