Oppo Find X9 Pro VS Vivo X300 Pro
We are comparing the Oppo Find X9 Pro (Oppo) with the Vivo X300 Pro (Vivo). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Oppo Find X9 Pro AND Vivo X300 Pro
Here’s how Oppo Find X9 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Pro
-
15% larger battery (7500 mAh vs 6510 mAh)
-
1% lighter at 224g
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Pro
-
15% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3658712 vs 3177977)
-
10% higher single-core Geekbench score (3563 vs 3235)
-
Higher resolution (1260×2800)
-
9% higher multi-core Geekbench score (10512 vs 9626)
-
13% faster charging (90 W vs 80 W)
-
25% brighter (4500 nits vs 3600 nits)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Oppo Find X9 Pro AND Vivo X300 Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Oppo Find X9 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Oppo | Vivo |
| Release Date: | October 16, 2025 | October 17, 2025 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 9500 | Dimensity 9500 |
| GPU: | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 224g | 226g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1272×2772 | 1260×2800 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 450 | 453 |
| Display Technology: | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 3600 nits | 4500 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | : OIS, periscope zoom (3×), Hasselblad tuning, Color Sensor, Laser AF | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens, HDR |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60/120fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | 50 MP |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-828 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.28" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.7 |
| Focal Length | 70 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.4" |
| Pixel Size | 0.5 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 7500 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 32 | 31 |
| Battery Type: | Si-C Li-Ion | Si-C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 80W | 90W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | 166 | 171 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3235 | 3563 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 9626 | 10512 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3177977 | 3658712 |
| CPU | 930222 | 1062762 |
| GPU | 1187584 | 1342762 |
| MEM | 368688 | 466511 |
| UX | 691483 | 786677 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 3059668 | 3539789 |
| CPU | 725117 | 1039348 |
| GPU | 1447366 | 1371288 |
| MEM | 456144 | 383559 |
| UX | 431041 | 745594 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Sim | Dual Sim |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Oppo Find X9 Pro AND Vivo X300 Pro
The charts below visualize how Oppo Find X9 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Oppo Find X9 Pro AND Vivo X300 Pro
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Oppo Find X9 Pro’s 6.78 inches screen compared to the Vivo X300 Pro’s 6.78 inches display.
Oppo Find X9 Pro
6.78 inches″
Vivo X300 Pro
6.78 inches″
Release Timeline of Oppo Find X9 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro
Oppo Find X9 Pro was released 1 day earlier than Vivo X300 Pro.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, this is a close match and neither phone clearly wins overall. Oppo Find X9 Pro is stronger in Camera. Vivo X300 Pro is stronger in Performance. They are about even in Display and Battery. Pick based on what you value most day to day.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.