Oppo Find X9 Pro VS Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
We are comparing the Oppo Find X9 Pro (Oppo) with the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Oppo Find X9 Pro AND Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Here’s how Oppo Find X9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Pro
-
50% larger battery (7500 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
3% higher single-core Geekbench score (3235 vs 3145)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
78% faster charging (80 W vs 45 W)
-
38% brighter (3600 nits vs 2600 nits)
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
-
Superior display technology (Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X)
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
5% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3326148 vs 3177977)
-
Higher resolution (1440×3120)
-
3% lighter at 218g
-
2% larger display (6.9 inches vs 6.78 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Oppo Find X9 Pro AND Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Oppo Find X9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Oppo Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Oppo | Samsung |
| Release Date: | October 16, 2025 | February 3, 2025 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| GPU: | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Adreno 830 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Weight: | 224g | 218g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.78 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1272×2772 | 1440×3120 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 450 | 498 |
| Display Technology: | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 3600 nits | 2600 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Quad Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | : OIS, periscope zoom (3×), Hasselblad tuning, Color Sensor, Laser AF | LOG Video, ProVisual Engine, Laser autofocus, Quad Tele System |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60/120fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 8K at 30fps, 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.7 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-828 | Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP2 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.3" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 0.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/3.4 |
| Focal Length | 70 mm | 111 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 | Sony IMX854 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.52" |
| Pixel Size | 0.5 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.9 |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN3 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.5" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Samsung S5K3LU |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/3.2" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 7500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 32 | 31 |
| Battery Type: | Si-C Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 80W | 45W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | 166 | 151 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3235 | 3145 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 9626 | 9864 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3177977 | 3326148 |
| CPU | 930222 | 1090904 |
| GPU | 1187584 | 1225203 |
| MEM | 368688 | 378840 |
| UX | 691483 | 631201 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 3059668 | 2731492 |
| CPU | 725117 | 655716 |
| GPU | 1447366 | 1211975 |
| MEM | 456144 | 472645 |
| UX | 431041 | 391156 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Sim | Dual Sim |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Oppo Find X9 Pro AND Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The charts below visualize how Oppo Find X9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Oppo Find X9 Pro AND Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Oppo Find X9 Pro’s 6.78 inches screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra’s 6.9 inches display.
Oppo Find X9 Pro
6.78 inches″
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
6.9 inches″
Release Timeline of Oppo Find X9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra was released 8 months, 13 days earlier than Oppo Find X9 Pro.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Oppo Find X9 Pro has a narrow overall lead compared to the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Camera and Battery. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is the better fit if your top priority is Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.