Oppo Find N6 VS Motorola Razr Fold
We are comparing the Oppo Find N6 (Oppo) with the Motorola Razr Fold (Motorola). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Oppo Find N6 AND Motorola Razr Fold
Here’s how Oppo Find N6 and Motorola Razr Fold stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find N6
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
26% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3809818 vs 3024369)
-
29% higher single-core Geekbench score (3367 vs 2617)
-
Higher resolution (2248x2480)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30fps, 1080p at 30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR
-
7% lighter at 225g
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr Fold
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 32 MP + 20 MP
-
3% higher multi-core Geekbench score (8819 vs 8573)
-
Phone unlock via face
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Oppo Find N6 AND Motorola Razr Fold
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Oppo Find N6 and Motorola Razr Fold.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Oppo Find N6 | Motorola Razr Fold |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Oppo | Motorola |
| Release Date: | March 20, 2026 | April 18, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| GPU: | Adreno 840 | Adreno 830 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 225 g | 243 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 8.12 inches | 8.1 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 2248x2480 | 2232 x 2484 pixels |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 412 | 410 |
| Display Technology: | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable LTPO P-OLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 2500 nits | — |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 200 MP | 50 MP + 50 MP + 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60/120fps (Dolby Vision), 1080p at 30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 20 MP | 32 MP + 20 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30fps, 1080p at 30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | — | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.28" |
| Pixel Size | 0.5 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 70 mm | 71 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.75" | 1/1.95" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | 12 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.75" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | AF | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 20 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.42" | — |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Stabilization | — | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 16 |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Charging Speed: | 80W wired, 44W UFCS, 55W PPS, 18W PD/QC | 80W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16GB, 12GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1TB, 512GB, 256GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | — | 164 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3367 | 2617 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 8573 | 8819 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3809818 | 3024369 |
| CPU | 928077 | 1003820 |
| GPU | 1178963 | 1164992 |
| MEM | 499953 | 379415 |
| UX | 629586 | 678500 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 3262605 | 2342132 |
| CPU | 823441 | 624873 |
| GPU | 1232154 | 1217691 |
| MEM | 392318 | 449196 |
| UX | 814692 | 431276 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side-mounted | Side Mounted |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | — | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Oppo Find N6 AND Motorola Razr Fold
The charts below visualize how Oppo Find N6 and Motorola Razr Fold stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Oppo Find N6 AND Motorola Razr Fold
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Oppo Find N6’s 8.12 inches screen compared to the Motorola Razr Fold’s 8.1 inches display.
Oppo Find N6
8.12 inches″
Motorola Razr Fold
8.1 inches″
Release Timeline of Oppo Find N6 and Motorola Razr Fold
Oppo Find N6 was released 29 days earlier than Motorola Razr Fold.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Oppo Find N6
Motorola Razr Fold
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, this is a close match and neither phone clearly wins overall. Oppo Find N6 is stronger in Performance. Motorola Razr Fold is stronger in Camera. They are about even in Display and Battery. Pick based on what you value most day to day.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.