Motorola Razr Fold VS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
We are comparing the Motorola Razr Fold (Motorola) with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Motorola Razr Fold AND Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Here’s how Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr Fold
-
25% larger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800 mAh)
-
Higher resolution (2232 x 2484 pixels)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 32 MP + 20 MP
-
78% faster charging (80 W vs 45 W)
-
7% larger display (8.1 inches vs 7.6 inches)
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
-
12% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3382020 vs 3024369)
-
39% higher single-core Geekbench score (3645 vs 2617)
-
26% higher multi-core Geekbench score (11102 vs 8819)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps
-
17% lighter at 201g
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Motorola Razr Fold AND Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Motorola | Samsung |
| Release Date: | April 18, 2026 | August 7, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | Adreno 830 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 17 |
| Weight: | 243 g | 201 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 8.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 2232 x 2484 pixels | 1848 x 2448 pixels |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 410 | 403 |
| Display Technology: | Foldable LTPO P-OLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP + 50 MP + 50 MP | 50 MP + 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 32 MP + 20 MP | 10 MP + 10 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30 fps | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-828 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Dual Pixel Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | — |
| Focal Length | 71 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Pixel Size | 0.8 micron | — |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | — |
| Stabilization | Optical | — |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.9 |
| Focal Length | 12 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.51" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 32 MP | 10 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 3648 x 2736 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 22 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | — | Sony IMX374 |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/3.52" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 6000 mAh | 4800 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 16 | 26 |
| Battery Type: | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Charging Speed: | 80W | 45W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | 164 | — |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2617 | 3645 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 8819 | 11102 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3024369 | 3382020 |
| CPU | 1003820 | 992447 |
| GPU | 1164992 | 1292614 |
| MEM | 379415 | 372424 |
| UX | 678500 | 724535 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2342132 | 2197874 |
| CPU | 624873 | 1177510 |
| GPU | 1217691 | 1402206 |
| MEM | 449196 | 501463 |
| UX | 431276 | 922928 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Dual eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Side Mounted |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Motorola Razr Fold AND Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
The charts below visualize how Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Motorola Razr Fold AND Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Motorola Razr Fold’s 8.1 inches screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8’s 7.6 inches display.
Motorola Razr Fold
8.1 inches″
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
7.6 inches″
Release Timeline of Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Motorola Razr Fold was released 3 months, 20 days earlier than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Motorola Razr Fold. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Battery. The Motorola Razr Fold is the better fit if your top priority is Camera and Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.