Motorola Razr (2025) VS Motorola Razr (2026)
We are comparing the Motorola Razr (2025) ( Motorola ) head-to-head with the Motorola Razr (2026) ( Motorola ) . You'll get the key pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Note: This comparison of Motorola Razr (2025) vs. Motorola Razr (2026) is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Motorola Razr (2025) AND Motorola Razr (2026)
Here’s how Motorola Razr (2025) and Motorola Razr (2026) stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which phone excels where.
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr (2025)
-
100% more storage (256GB vs 128GB)
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr (2026)
-
7% larger battery (4800 mAh vs 4500 mAh)
-
9% higher AnTuTu v11 score (955007 vs 877010)
-
6% higher multi-core Geekbench score (3158 vs 2980)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Motorola Razr (2025) AND Motorola Razr (2026)
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Motorola Razr (2025) and Motorola Razr (2026).
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Motorola Razr (2025) | Motorola Razr (2026) |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Motorola | Motorola |
| Release Date: | May 15, 2025 | May 21, 2026 |
| GPU: | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| Operating System: | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 188 g | 188 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1080 x 2640 pixels | 1080 x 2640 pixels |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 413 | 413 |
| Display Technology: | Foldable LTPO P-OLED | Foldable LTPO P-OLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 1200 nits | 1200 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP + 13 MP | 50 MP + 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps | 4K at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 25 mm | — |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL GN8 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.95" |
| Pixel Size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Sony IMX258 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.0" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | 1.28 micron |
| Autofocus | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Image Resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 25 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV32B | OmniVision OV32B |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.14" | 1/3.14" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 4500 mAh | 4800 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 16 | 22 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Charging Speed: | 30W | 30W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB | 128 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1064 | 1070 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 2980 | 3158 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 877010 | 955007 |
| CPU | 349816 | 325558 |
| GPU | 142976 | 147811 |
| MEM | 163300 | 199298 |
| UX | 220918 | 282340 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Side Mounted |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Motorola Razr (2025) AND Motorola Razr (2026)
The charts below visualize how Motorola Razr (2025) and Motorola Razr (2026) stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Motorola Razr (2025) AND Motorola Razr (2026)
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Motorola Razr (2025)’s 6.9 inches screen compared to the Motorola Razr (2026)’s 6.9 inches display. Each rectangle is scaled so you can see at a glance which phone offers a larger viewing area.
Motorola Razr (2025)
6.9 inches″
Motorola Razr (2026)
6.9 inches″
Release Timeline of Motorola Razr (2025) and Motorola Razr (2026)
Motorola Razr (2025) was released 1 year, 6 days earlier than Motorola Razr (2026).
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Motorola Razr (2025)
Motorola Razr (2026)
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Motorola Razr (2026) has a narrow overall lead compared to the Motorola Razr (2025). Its strongest advantages are in Battery. They are still fairly close in Performance, Camera and Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.