Motorola Edge (2026) VS Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
We are comparing the Motorola Edge (2026) (Motorola) with the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Motorola Edge (2026) AND Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Here’s how Motorola Edge (2026) and Samsung Galaxy A37 5G stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Motorola Edge (2026)
-
7% higher AnTuTu v11 score (979808 vs 917489)
-
33% more RAM (8GB vs 6GB)
-
Higher resolution (1216 x 2640 pixels)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
51% faster charging (68 W vs 45 W)
-
Phone unlock via face
-
18% lighter at 160.5g
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
-
Superior display technology (Super AMOLED)
-
7% higher single-core Geekbench score (1153 vs 1075)
-
12% higher multi-core Geekbench score (3457 vs 3080)
-
Dual SIM support
-
6% larger display (6.7 inches vs 6.3 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Motorola Edge (2026) AND Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Motorola Edge (2026) and Samsung Galaxy A37 5G.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Motorola Edge (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A37 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Motorola | Samsung |
| Release Date: | June 11, 2026 | March 25, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 7400 | Exynos 1480 |
| GPU: | Arm Mali-G615 MC2 | Samsung Xclipse 530 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 160.5 g | 196 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1216 x 2640 pixels | 1080 x 2340 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 460 | 385 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | — | 1898 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP + 10 MP + 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60/240 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 720p at 240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps | 4K at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | — |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-710 | Sony IMX906 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | — |
| Focal Length | 73 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.94" | — |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | — |
| Stabilization | Optical | — |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 12 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | — |
| Autofocus | Autofocus | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.95 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/3.2" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 23 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 68W | 45W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage: | 128 GB | 128 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1075 | 1153 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3080 | 3457 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 979808 | 917489 |
| CPU | 345028 | 356292 |
| GPU | 150583 | 154325 |
| MEM | 193105 | 146189 |
| UX | 291092 | 260683 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 922227 | 720015 |
| CPU | 329972 | 232912 |
| GPU | 147724 | 169273 |
| MEM | 155228 | 148113 |
| UX | 289303 | 169717 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Motorola Edge (2026) AND Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
The charts below visualize how Motorola Edge (2026) and Samsung Galaxy A37 5G stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Motorola Edge (2026) AND Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Motorola Edge (2026)’s 6.3 inches screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G’s 6.7 inches display.
Motorola Edge (2026)
6.3 inches″
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
6.7 inches″
Release Timeline of Motorola Edge (2026) and Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G was released 2 months, 17 days earlier than Motorola Edge (2026).
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Motorola Edge (2026)
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy A37 5G has a narrow overall lead compared to the Motorola Edge (2026). Its strongest advantages are in Display. They are still fairly close in Performance, Camera and Battery.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.