Infinix Zero 40 5G VS Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
We are comparing the Infinix Zero 40 5G (Infinix) with the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (Xiaomi). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Infinix Zero 40 5G AND Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Here’s how Infinix Zero 40 5G and Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Infinix Zero 40 5G
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 108 MP
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
Selfie video of 4K at 60 fps
-
7% lighter at 195g
-
2% larger display (6.78 inches vs 6.67 inches)
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
-
36% higher AnTuTu v11 score (1767128 vs 1301107)
-
53% higher single-core Geekbench score (1916 vs 1251)
-
33% more RAM (16GB vs 12GB)
-
Higher resolution (1440 x 3200)
-
35% higher multi-core Geekbench score (5305 vs 3932)
-
300% more storage (1 TB vs 256GB)
-
167% faster charging (120 W vs 45 W)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Infinix Zero 40 5G AND Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Infinix Zero 40 5G and Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Infinix Zero 40 5G | Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Infinix | Xiaomi |
| Release Date: | September 1, 2024 | May 1, 2024 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 8200 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| GPU: | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| Operating System: | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Weight: | 195 g | 209 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.78 inches | 6.67 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1080 x 2436 | 1440 x 3200 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 393 | 526 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 144 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 1300 nits | 4000 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 60 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 1080p slow motion at 240 fps | 8K at 24 fps, 4K at 60 fps, 1080p at 60 fps, 720p slow motion at 1920 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 60 fps | 1080p at 60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 12000 x 9000 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHM6 | OmniVision OVX8000 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.55" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | — | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 4608 x 3456 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1 | Omnivision OV16A1Q |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/3.06" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 19 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Charging Speed: | 45W | 120W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1251 | 1916 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3932 | 5305 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1301107 | 1767128 |
| CPU | 449556 | 573925 |
| GPU | 229244 | 430773 |
| MEM | 240857 | 319179 |
| UX | 381450 | 443251 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | — | 1565039 |
| CPU | — | 371605 |
| GPU | — | 600082 |
| MEM | — | 294200 |
| UX | — | 299152 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Infinix Zero 40 5G AND Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
The charts below visualize how Infinix Zero 40 5G and Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Infinix Zero 40 5G AND Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Infinix Zero 40 5G’s 6.78 inches screen compared to the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro’s 6.67 inches display.
Infinix Zero 40 5G
6.78 inches″
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
6.67 inches″
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Infinix Zero 40 5G
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro has a narrow overall lead compared to the Infinix Zero 40 5G. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Display and Battery. The Infinix Zero 40 5G is the better fit if your top priority is Camera.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.