Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G VS CAMON 40 Pro 5G
We are comparing the Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G (Infinix) with the CAMON 40 Pro 5G (Tecno). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G AND CAMON 40 Pro 5G
Here’s how Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G and CAMON 40 Pro 5G stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G
-
98% higher AnTuTu v11 score (1801494 vs 909910)
-
18% higher single-core Geekbench score (1216 vs 1028)
-
19% higher multi-core Geekbench score (3896 vs 3273)
-
122% faster charging (100 W vs 45 W)
Reasons to consider the CAMON 40 Pro 5G
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
14% lighter at 179g
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G AND CAMON 40 Pro 5G
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G and CAMON 40 Pro 5G.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G | CAMON 40 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Infinix | Tecno |
| Release Date: | April 1, 2025 | March 3, 2025 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 8350 | Dimensity 7300 |
| GPU: | Mali-G615 MP6 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| Operating System: | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Weight: | 209 g | 179g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1080 x 2436 | 1080x2436 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 393 | 393 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 144 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | 1300 nits | — |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Dual LED flash, bokeh mode, pro mode | OIS, HDR, Panorama, Dual-LED Flash |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 60 fps, 1080p at 60 fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps | 4K at 30fps, 1080p at 30fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX896 | Sony LYT-700C |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase Autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | — |
| Focal Length | 70 mm | — |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | — |
| Stabilization | Optical | — |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Focal Length | 15 mm | — |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC32E1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.1" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.5 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A8 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.1" | 1/2.8" |
| Pixel Size | 1.12 micron | — |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 5200 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 19 | 12 |
| Battery Type: | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Charging Speed: | 100W | 45W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB | 12 GB, 8 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | — | 138 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1216 | 1028 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3896 | 3273 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1801494 | 909910 |
| CPU | 517382 | 343943 |
| GPU | 493306 | 130295 |
| MEM | 329335 | 175086 |
| UX | 461471 | 260586 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1421380 | 679446 |
| CPU | 288139 | 213556 |
| GPU | 531061 | 154945 |
| MEM | 341801 | 149808 |
| UX | 260379 | 161137 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Sim |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | — |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G AND CAMON 40 Pro 5G
The charts below visualize how Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G and CAMON 40 Pro 5G stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G AND CAMON 40 Pro 5G
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G’s 6.78 inches screen compared to the CAMON 40 Pro 5G’s 6.78 inches display.
Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G
6.78 inches″
CAMON 40 Pro 5G
6.78 inches″
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G
CAMON 40 Pro 5G
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G has a narrow overall lead compared to the CAMON 40 Pro 5G. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Camera and Battery. They are still fairly close in Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.