Honor X9e Pro VS Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
We are comparing the Honor X9e Pro (Honor) with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (Xiaomi). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Honor X9e Pro AND Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Here’s how Honor X9e Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Honor X9e Pro
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 108 MP
-
10% larger battery (11000 mAh vs 10000 mAh)
-
7% higher single-core Geekbench score (1174 vs 1099)
-
Higher resolution (1280 x 2788)
-
12% lighter at 203g
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
-
50% more RAM (12GB vs 8GB)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 32 MP
-
25% faster charging (100 W vs 80 W)
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30 fps
-
338% brighter (3500 nits vs 800 nits)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Honor X9e Pro AND Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Honor X9e Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Honor X9e Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Honor | Xiaomi |
| Release Date: | October 9, 2026 | August 28, 2026 |
| Mobile Chipset: | Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 |
| GPU: | Qualcomm Adreno | Qualcomm Adreno |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 203 g | 229.5 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.8 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1280 x 2788 | 1280 x 2772 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 451 | 447 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | 800 nits | 1060 nits (typical), 2000 nits (HBM), 3500 nits (peak) |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, HDR, panorama, portrait, Pro mode | LED flash, HDR, panorama, Pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 1080p at 30 fps | 4K at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 12000 x 9000 | 8160 x 6120 |
| Aperture | f/1.75 | f/1.5 |
| Focal Length | — | 26 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.67" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | PDAF |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | — | 15 mm |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Image Resolution | 3456 x 4608 | — |
| Aperture | f/2.45 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | — | CMOS |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.61 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 11000 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 50 |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Charging Speed: | 80W | 100W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 8 GB | 12 GB, 8 GB |
| Storage: | 512 GB, 256 GB | 512 GB, 256 GB, 128 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1174 | 1099 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3487 | 3481 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1008325 | 1010104 |
| CPU | 341959 | 346157 |
| GPU | 215381 | 215763 |
| MEM | 201913 | 196548 |
| UX | 249072 | 251636 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1017783 | 1017783 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Honor X9e Pro AND Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
The charts below visualize how Honor X9e Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Honor X9e Pro AND Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Honor X9e Pro’s 6.8 inches screen compared to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max’s 6.83 inches display.
Honor X9e Pro
6.8 inches″
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
6.83 inches″
Release Timeline of Honor X9e Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max was released 1 month, 11 days earlier than Honor X9e Pro.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Honor X9e Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max has a narrow overall lead compared to the Honor X9e Pro. Its strongest advantages are in Camera and Display. The Honor X9e Pro is the better fit if your top priority is Battery.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.