Honor Magic 9 Super VS Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
We are comparing the Honor Magic 9 Super (Honor) with the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Honor Magic 9 Super AND Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Here’s how Honor Magic 9 Super and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Honor Magic 9 Super
-
120% larger battery (11000 mAh vs 5000 mAh)
-
7% higher AnTuTu v11 score (4290399 vs 4005831)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
33% faster charging (80 W vs 60 W)
-
Phone unlock via face
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
-
Superior display technology (Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X)
-
9% higher single-core Geekbench score (3753 vs 3451)
-
Higher resolution (1440 x 3120)
-
100% more storage (1 TB vs 512GB)
-
6% lighter at 214g
-
1% larger display (6.9 inches vs 6.81 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Honor Magic 9 Super AND Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Honor Magic 9 Super and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Honor Magic 9 Super | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Honor | Samsung |
| Release Date: | September 28, 2026 | March 6, 2026 |
| Mobile Chipset: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 227 g | 214 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.81 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1280 x 2788 | 1440 x 3120 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 450 | 498 |
| Display Technology: | OLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | — | 2600 |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Quad Camera |
| Main Camera: | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, HDR, panorama, Pro mode, RAW support | Laser AF, Best Face, Horizon Lock, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps | 8K at 24/30fps, 4K at 30/60/120fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Image Resolution | 16384 x 12288 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.4 |
| Focal Length | — | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHP5 | Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP2 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.3" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.6 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.9 |
| Focal Length | 68 mm | 111 mm |
| Sensor | — | Sony IMX854 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.93" | 1/2.52" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.9 |
| Focal Length | — | 13 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN3 |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/2.5" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Autofocus | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung ISOCELL S5K3LU |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.88" | 1/3.2" |
| Pixel Size | — | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 11000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 29 |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 80W | 60W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | — | 157 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3451 | 3753 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 11215 | 11259 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 4290399 | 4005831 |
| CPU | 1263745 | 1165757 |
| GPU | 1443960 | 1539732 |
| MEM | 494242 | 488505 |
| UX | 1088452 | 811837 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 4004107 | 3720219 |
| CPU | 1177510 | 1094797 |
| GPU | 1402206 | 1447696 |
| MEM | 501463 | 425113 |
| UX | 922928 | 752613 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | — |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | — |
| Audio Jack: | No | — |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Honor Magic 9 Super AND Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
The charts below visualize how Honor Magic 9 Super and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Honor Magic 9 Super AND Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Honor Magic 9 Super’s 6.81 inches screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra’s 6.9 inches display.
Honor Magic 9 Super
6.81 inches″
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
6.9 inches″
Release Timeline of Honor Magic 9 Super and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra was released 6 months, 22 days earlier than Honor Magic 9 Super.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Honor Magic 9 Super
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Honor Magic 9 Super has a narrow overall lead compared to the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Battery. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is the better fit if your top priority is Camera and Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.