Honor Magic 9 Pro Max VS Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
We are comparing the Honor Magic 9 Pro Max (Honor) with the Oppo Find X10 Pro Max (Oppo). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Honor Magic 9 Pro Max AND Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
Here’s how Honor Magic 9 Pro Max and Oppo Find X10 Pro Max stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Honor Magic 9 Pro Max
-
Superior display technology (LTPO OLED)
-
10% larger battery (8800 mAh vs 8000 mAh)
-
10% higher AnTuTu v11 score (5195978 vs 4706878)
-
Higher resolution (1320 x 2868)
-
25% faster charging (100 W vs 80 W)
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
10% higher single-core Geekbench score (3943 vs 3590)
-
22% higher multi-core Geekbench score (12130 vs 9929)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Honor Magic 9 Pro Max AND Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Honor Magic 9 Pro Max and Oppo Find X10 Pro Max.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Honor Magic 9 Pro Max | Oppo Find X10 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Honor | Oppo |
| Release Date: | September 28, 2026 | September 22, 2026 |
| Mobile Chipset: | Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | Dimensity 9600 Pro |
| GPU: | Adreno 850 | Arm Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP12 |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | Android 17 |
| Weight: | 233 g | 233 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.8 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1320 x 2868 | 1272 x 2772 pixels |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 464 | 450 |
| Display Technology: | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | — | 2000 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | LED flash, laser autofocus, HDR, panorama, ARRI Cinema, Pro mode | LED flash, Bokeh mode, Pro mode |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps, 1080p@240fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 55 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K@60fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 200 |
| Image Resolution | 16384 x 12288 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.57 | f/1.5 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung ISOCELL HPC |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.28" | 1/1.3" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser Autofocus | PDAF |
| Stabilization | OIS | OIS |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 200 |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.1 |
| Focal Length | 85 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 0.56 micron | 0.5 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | — |
| Stabilization | OIS | OIS |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 200 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 12 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.88" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.61 micron | — |
| Autofocus | Autofocus | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 55 MP | 50 |
| Image Resolution | 8576 x 6432 | — |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 21 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.93" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.6 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 8800 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Charging Speed: | 100W | 80W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3590 | 3943 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 9929 | 12130 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 5195978 | 4706878 |
| CPU | 1407243 | 1353582 |
| GPU | 1940214 | 1824959 |
| MEM | 739539 | 478733 |
| UX | 1108982 | 1049604 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 5195978 | — |
| CPU | 1407243 | — |
| GPU | 1940214 | — |
| MEM | 739539 | — |
| UX | 1108982 | — |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Honor Magic 9 Pro Max AND Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
The charts below visualize how Honor Magic 9 Pro Max and Oppo Find X10 Pro Max stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Honor Magic 9 Pro Max AND Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Honor Magic 9 Pro Max’s 6.8 inches screen compared to the Oppo Find X10 Pro Max’s 6.78 inches display.
Honor Magic 9 Pro Max
6.8 inches″
Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
6.78 inches″
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Honor Magic 9 Pro Max
Oppo Find X10 Pro Max
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Honor Magic 9 Pro Max has a narrow overall lead compared to the Oppo Find X10 Pro Max. Its strongest advantages are in Display and Battery. The Oppo Find X10 Pro Max is the better fit if your top priority is Performance.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.