Honor 600 Pro VS CAMON 40 Pro 5G
We are comparing the Honor 600 Pro (Honor) with the CAMON 40 Pro 5G (Tecno). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Honor 600 Pro AND CAMON 40 Pro 5G
Here’s how Honor 600 Pro and CAMON 40 Pro 5G stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Honor 600 Pro
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
35% larger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200 mAh)
-
255% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3226727 vs 909910)
-
205% higher single-core Geekbench score (3135 vs 1028)
-
Higher resolution (1264 x 2728)
-
197% higher multi-core Geekbench score (9707 vs 3273)
-
100% more storage (512GB vs 256GB)
Reasons to consider the CAMON 40 Pro 5G
-
20% smoother display (144 Hz vs 120 Hz)
-
3% larger display (6.78 inches vs 6.57 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Honor 600 Pro AND CAMON 40 Pro 5G
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Honor 600 Pro and CAMON 40 Pro 5G.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Honor 600 Pro | CAMON 40 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Honor | Tecno |
| Release Date: | April 29, 2026 | March 3, 2025 |
| Mobile Chipset: | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 7300 |
| GPU: | Adreno 830 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| Operating System: | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Weight: | — | 179g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.57 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1264 x 2728 | 1080x2436 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 458 | 393 |
| Display Technology: | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 144 |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | OIS, HDR, Panorama, Dual-LED Flash |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K at 30fps, 1080p at 30fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal Length | — | 23 mm |
| Sensor | — | Sony LYT-700C |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.4" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 0.56 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | — |
| Autofocus | PDAF | — |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/4.0" |
| Autofocus | AF | — |
| Stabilization | — | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Focal Length | — | 24 mm |
| Sensor Size | — | 1/2.8" |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Stabilization | — | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 7000 mAh or 6400 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 12 |
| Battery Type: | Si/C Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Charging Speed: | 80W | 45W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB | 12 GB, 8 GB |
| Storage: | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | — | 138 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3135 | 1028 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 9707 | 3273 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3226727 | 909910 |
| CPU | 1003820 | 343943 |
| GPU | 1164992 | 130295 |
| MEM | 379415 | 175086 |
| UX | 678500 | 260586 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2723036 | 679446 |
| CPU | 624873 | 213556 |
| GPU | 1217691 | 154945 |
| MEM | 449196 | 149808 |
| UX | 431276 | 161137 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Sim |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | — |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Honor 600 Pro AND CAMON 40 Pro 5G
The charts below visualize how Honor 600 Pro and CAMON 40 Pro 5G stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Honor 600 Pro AND CAMON 40 Pro 5G
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Honor 600 Pro’s 6.57 inches screen compared to the CAMON 40 Pro 5G’s 6.78 inches display.
Honor 600 Pro
6.57 inches″
CAMON 40 Pro 5G
6.78 inches″
Release Timeline of Honor 600 Pro and CAMON 40 Pro 5G
CAMON 40 Pro 5G was released 1 year, 1 month, 26 days earlier than Honor 600 Pro.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Honor 600 Pro
CAMON 40 Pro 5G
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Honor 600 Pro edges out overall compared to the CAMON 40 Pro 5G. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Battery. The CAMON 40 Pro 5G is the better fit if your top priority is Camera.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.